Compare Drata and Secureframe 
- Users report that Secureframe excels in its Quality of Support, scoring 9.3, with many reviewers mentioning the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, while Drata shines even brighter with a score of 9.7, indicating a more robust support experience.
- Reviewers mention that both products have strong Compliance Monitoring capabilities, with Secureframe scoring 9.3 and Drata slightly ahead at 9.5. Users appreciate the ease of tracking compliance requirements in both platforms.
- G2 users highlight that Drata offers superior Ease of Setup with a score of 9.1 compared to Secureframe's 8.8, suggesting that Drata may be more user-friendly for new customers looking to get started quickly.
- Users on G2 report that Secureframe's Centralized Vendor Catalog feature, scoring 8.8, is beneficial for managing vendor relationships, but Drata's higher score of 9.1 indicates a more comprehensive and user-friendly approach to vendor management.
- Reviewers say that both platforms perform well in Security Auditing, with Secureframe at 9.4 and Drata at 9.5. Users appreciate the thoroughness of the auditing features, but Drata's slight edge suggests a more refined auditing process.
- Users report that while both products offer solid Risk Assessment features, Secureframe's scoring of 9.0 for Risk Scoring is slightly better than Drata's 8.9, indicating a more effective risk evaluation process in Secureframe.
- Unlimited Admins
- Unlimited Integrations (140+ to choose from)
- Dynamic Policy Builder
There are a lot of vendors to choose from for SOC 2 automation. We chose Drata because their team has former auditors and their CEO Adam understands there is much more to SOC 2 than just checking the box for compliance. We decided to use Drata for our...
The real downside of using drata was the fact that Auditors were reluctant to use it. All the evidence was there in the platform and visible for them to use, but they still wanted us to walk them through all of our controls over video chats. This defeated...
I usually hate cold sales e-mails offering services... I had already spoken to three other SOC readiness firms and had received quotes. I'm so happy I responded to Secureframe's cold outreach and decided to engage with them as opposed to the other firms....
Information in multiple sources/difficult to answer compliance related questions Customer success rep was not able to answer questions and had to schedule separate meetings for engineering experts
There are a lot of vendors to choose from for SOC 2 automation. We chose Drata because their team has former auditors and their CEO Adam understands there is much more to SOC 2 than just checking the box for compliance. We decided to use Drata for our...
I usually hate cold sales e-mails offering services... I had already spoken to three other SOC readiness firms and had received quotes. I'm so happy I responded to Secureframe's cold outreach and decided to engage with them as opposed to the other firms....
The real downside of using drata was the fact that Auditors were reluctant to use it. All the evidence was there in the platform and visible for them to use, but they still wanted us to walk them through all of our controls over video chats. This defeated...
Information in multiple sources/difficult to answer compliance related questions Customer success rep was not able to answer questions and had to schedule separate meetings for engineering experts
