Compare DISCO eDiscovery and Epiq Discovery 
- Users report that DISCO eDiscovery excels in document review with a score of 9.4, highlighting its intuitive interface and efficient workflow, while Epiq Discovery, with a score of 8.7, is noted for its solid performance but lacks some of the advanced features that DISCO offers.
- Reviewers mention that DISCO's document collection feature scores 8.7, which is slightly lower than Epiq's 9.1, but users appreciate DISCO's streamlined process that integrates well with other tools, making it easier to manage collections.
- G2 users indicate that both platforms have strong quality of support, scoring 9.3 each, but users on G2 note that DISCO's support team is often quicker to respond, enhancing the overall user experience.
- Users say that Epiq Discovery shines in legal hold management with a score of 8.8, as it provides robust tracking and compliance features, while DISCO's score of 7.2 suggests it may not be as comprehensive in this area.
- Reviewers mention that DISCO's ease of use is a standout feature, scoring 9.3, which many users attribute to its user-friendly design and straightforward navigation, whereas Epiq Discovery's score of 8.3 indicates a steeper learning curve for new users.
- Users report that DISCO's project analytics feature, scoring 8.3, is effective but lacks some customization options compared to Epiq's 8.1, which offers more flexibility in reporting and metrics, catering to users who need detailed insights.
The CS Disco Platform is very easy to use and incredibly intuitive. Anyone can learn to use it.
Billing, lack of transparency on data usage, terms of service, nickle and diming for everything (e.g., help deleting a matter). It's either do it yourself or pay through the nose. There's no in between.
I value the response of customer service and also how easy the platform is to navigate. Tagging is straight farward and any one can learn to upload files.
QC review of productions are not easily accomplished -- there is no ability to filter data fields to confirm responsiveness, privilege, redaction, and confidentiality tagging for the dataset. Indepdent searches are required and need to be rerun after each...
The CS Disco Platform is very easy to use and incredibly intuitive. Anyone can learn to use it.
I value the response of customer service and also how easy the platform is to navigate. Tagging is straight farward and any one can learn to upload files.
Billing, lack of transparency on data usage, terms of service, nickle and diming for everything (e.g., help deleting a matter). It's either do it yourself or pay through the nose. There's no in between.
QC review of productions are not easily accomplished -- there is no ability to filter data fields to confirm responsiveness, privilege, redaction, and confidentiality tagging for the dataset. Indepdent searches are required and need to be rerun after each...
