Compare Digital.ai TeamForge and GitLab 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (40.0% of reviews)
Small-Business (37.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Digital.ai TeamForge
Star Rating
(21)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (40.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Digital.ai TeamForgeGitLab
Star Rating
(823)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about GitLabSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Digital.ai TeamForge excels in Configuration Management with a score of 8.7, highlighting its robust capabilities in managing software configurations effectively. In contrast, GitLab's Configuration Management score is slightly lower at 8.8, indicating that while it is competent, it may not offer the same depth of features.
- Reviewers mention that GitLab shines in Test Automation, achieving a score of 9.1, which users appreciate for its seamless integration and efficiency in automating testing processes. Digital.ai TeamForge, while also strong in this area with a score of 9.0, does not receive the same level of acclaim for user experience in automation.
- G2 users highlight the superior Issue Tracking capabilities of GitLab, scoring 9.2, which reviewers say provides a more intuitive and user-friendly interface for tracking bugs and issues compared to Digital.ai TeamForge's score of 9.0. This difference can significantly impact daily operations for teams relying on effective issue management.
- Users on G2 report that Digital.ai TeamForge's Access Control features, scoring 8.9, are particularly praised for their granularity and security, making it a preferred choice for organizations with strict compliance needs. GitLab, while also strong in this area with a score of 8.8, may not offer the same level of customization.
- Reviewers mention that GitLab's Deployment Automation features, scoring 9.0, are highly regarded for their ease of use and effectiveness, allowing teams to deploy applications quickly and reliably. Digital.ai TeamForge, with a score of 8.8, is seen as slightly less efficient in this regard, which could affect deployment speed for users.
- Users say that the Community Support for GitLab is robust, with many resources and active forums, contributing to a score of 8.6. In comparison, Digital.ai TeamForge's community support is perceived as less active, which may lead to challenges in finding quick solutions or guidance from peers.
Featured Products
Sponsored
Axify
(4)
Build Automation
Visit Website
Sponsored
OX Security
(48)
Build Automation
Visit Website
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Digital.ai TeamForge
No pricing availableGitLab
No pricing availableFree Trial
Digital.ai TeamForge
No trial information availableGitLab
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.3
15
9.1
613
Ease of Use
8.0
16
8.7
615
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.5
175
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.6
160
Quality of Support
7.9
17
8.5
481
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.8
135
Product Direction (% positive)
8.5
16
8.7
581
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
8.7
117
Not enough data
8.9
125
Not enough data
8.6
117
Functionality
Not enough data
9.0
123
Not enough data
8.6
109
Not enough data
8.5
104
Not enough data
8.7
109
Not enough data
8.6
98
Processes
Not enough data
9.1
126
Not enough data
9.0
115
Not enough data
8.7
115
Administration
Not enough data
9.1
23
Not enough data
8.9
22
Analysis
Not enough data
8.5
21
Not enough data
8.8
22
Not enough data
8.9
22
Not enough data
8.7
21
Testing
Not enough data
8.6
22
Not enough data
8.6
22
Not enough data
8.9
21
Not enough data
8.7
21
Not enough data
8.6
19
Not enough data
8.2
19
Not enough data
8.5
19
Administration
Not enough data
9.0
21
Not enough data
8.7
21
Analysis
Not enough data
8.3
20
Not enough data
9.2
20
Not enough data
8.8
20
Not enough data
8.8
20
Not enough data
8.8
20
Testing
Not enough data
8.6
19
Not enough data
9.1
19
Not enough data
9.0
18
Not enough data
9.0
17
Not enough data
8.9
16
Not enough data
9.2
17
Administration
Not enough data
8.8
72
Not enough data
8.7
73
Not enough data
8.7
70
Not enough data
8.8
75
Automation
Not enough data
9.0
74
Not enough data
8.4
67
Not enough data
9.0
74
Not enough data
8.7
68
IT Management
Not enough data
8.7
69
Not enough data
8.8
69
Not enough data
8.6
66
Functionality
Not enough data
8.8
187
Not enough data
8.9
187
Not enough data
8.6
180
Management
Not enough data
8.7
174
Not enough data
8.3
167
Not enough data
8.9
180
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
8.6
121
Not enough data
8.5
115
Not enough data
8.5
123
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
8.4
120
Not enough data
8.8
128
Not enough data
8.8
120
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
8.8
60
Not enough data
8.7
65
Not enough data
8.7
62
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
8.8
59
Not enough data
8.9
59
Not enough data
8.9
56
Management
Not enough data
8.8
122
Not enough data
8.8
128
Not enough data
8.5
115
Functionality
Not enough data
8.8
127
Not enough data
8.8
127
Not enough data
8.7
119
Processes
Not enough data
9.0
131
Not enough data
8.5
120
Not enough data
8.9
134
Functionality
Not enough data
8.9
199
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
187
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
181
|
Verified
Management
Not enough data
8.9
189
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
193
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
174
|
Verified
Documentation
Not enough data
8.8
107
Not enough data
8.6
103
Not enough data
8.4
104
Security
Not enough data
8.0
92
Not enough data
8.4
92
Not enough data
8.9
101
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Value Analysis
Not enough data
8.9
37
Not enough data
8.7
39
Not enough data
8.6
35
Not enough data
8.8
35
Value Management
Not enough data
9.0
37
Not enough data
8.6
39
Not enough data
8.8
38
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Digital.ai TeamForge and GitLab are categorized as Continuous Delivery and Continuous Integration
Unique Categories
Digital.ai TeamForge is categorized as Version Control Clients and Build Automation
GitLab is categorized as Secure Code Review, DevOps Platforms, Value Stream Management, Software Composition Analysis, Cloud Infrastructure Automation, Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Application Release Orchestration, Version Control Hosting, Peer Code Review, Bug Tracking, and AI Code Generation
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Digital.ai TeamForge
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
GitLab
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
25.0%
Information Technology and Services
15.0%
Education Management
10.0%
Research
5.0%
Logistics and Supply Chain
5.0%
Other
40.0%
Computer Software
33.5%
Information Technology and Services
23.4%
Internet
4.1%
Financial Services
3.6%
Computer & Network Security
2.4%
Other
33.0%
Most Helpful Reviews
Digital.ai TeamForge
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Verified User in Computer Software
I like the part being Efficient and integrated coding, End-to-end traceability, Trackers, Continuous integration & delivery and many other great features.
Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Education Management
While secure, training is a must in order to ensure compliance.
GitLab
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Ricardo R.
Verified User in Internet
An excellent solution for those who like want private or shared repositories and require a on promises or private cloud installation. Provides great options for code reviewing and developers interactions on merge requests. Updates both for new...
Most Helpful Critical Review
Victor H.
Verified User in Computer Software
I don't like the layout of the app, switching target branches should be more intuitive.
Verified User in Computer Software
I like the part being Efficient and integrated coding, End-to-end traceability, Trackers, Continuous integration & delivery and many other great features.
Ricardo R.
Verified User in Internet
An excellent solution for those who like want private or shared repositories and require a on promises or private cloud installation. Provides great options for code reviewing and developers interactions on merge requests. Updates both for new...
Verified User in Education Management
While secure, training is a must in order to ensure compliance.
Victor H.
Verified User in Computer Software
I don't like the layout of the app, switching target branches should be more intuitive.
Alternatives
Discussions
How many servers do I need to run a CollabNet TeamForge site?
1 comment
Official Response from Digital.ai TeamForge
You can run TeamForge on one server or split up its services among multiple servers.Read more
Should I move my TeamForge database to its own server?
1 comment
Official Response from Digital.ai TeamForge
If you expect your site to have heavy user traffic, you may want to run the site's database on its own server.Read more
How does TeamForge handle third-party applications?
1 comment
Official Response from Digital.ai TeamForge
TeamForge relies on many third-party applications to augment or enhance functionality.Read more
Is GitLab paid?
5 comments
PG
Yes, Gitlab is paid as it provides the flexibility to use all the features of the GitHub and Git as well as the freedom to use your own DataBase so that you...Read more
Is GitLab free software?
4 comments
RB
Yes, in that for non-commercial users, payment is unnecessary. Additionally, its source is publicly available.Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 2.5 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
or continue with
Gmail.com addresses not permitted. A business domain using Google is allowed.
By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
