Compare Dell Avamar and Dell NetWorker 
- Users report that Dell Avamar excels in Data Deduplication with a score of 9.1, which significantly reduces storage requirements and enhances backup efficiency. In contrast, Dell NetWorker's score of 7.9 indicates it may not be as effective in this area, leading to potentially higher storage costs.
- Reviewers mention that Dell Avamar's File Server Backup capabilities are rated at 9.1, making it a preferred choice for mid-market users who need reliable file backup solutions. Dell NetWorker, with a score of 8.3, may not meet the same level of performance for this specific need.
- G2 users highlight that Dell Avamar offers superior On-Demand Restoration features, scoring 8.8, which allows for quick recovery of data when needed. Users on G2 note that Dell NetWorker, while still functional, scores slightly lower at 8.0, indicating a less seamless restoration experience.
- Reviewers say that Dell Avamar's Continuous Backup feature, rated at 8.7, provides a more robust solution for users needing real-time data protection. In comparison, Dell NetWorker does not have a comparable feature, which may leave some users wanting more in terms of data protection.
- Users report that Dell Avamar's Quality of Support is rated at 8.2, with many reviewers praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team. Conversely, Dell NetWorker's support rating of 7.5 suggests that users may experience longer wait times or less effective assistance.
- Users on G2 mention that Dell Avamar's Security Standards score of 8.9 reflects a strong commitment to data protection, which is crucial for businesses handling sensitive information. Dell NetWorker, with a score of 7.8, may not provide the same level of assurance, potentially impacting user trust.
I love the options for backup for specific software and operating systems. I can choose a different profile for virtual machines, linux, SQL, exchange etc. It is very easy to restore anything from 1 file or the entire snapshot. Restoring mailbox objects...
Few options outside of the "EMC Approved" Methods to get the data to multiple locations to make the backups secure by holding in multiple ways. It seemed like using it more was leading us down a path of spending more and more money with EMC. The...
Networker is a good backup product. It's lightweight, and I haven't seen the client itself cause issues on any of our servers in the 11+ years I've used it. Like most enterprise products Networker needs to be setup properly and tuned for the environment...
We've proven that this product persistently misses some files, but not always the same files, causing our Oracle DB recoveries to fail. Working with EMC support for months to years never resulted in a solution. Oracle DBA's refuse to rely on Networker...
I love the options for backup for specific software and operating systems. I can choose a different profile for virtual machines, linux, SQL, exchange etc. It is very easy to restore anything from 1 file or the entire snapshot. Restoring mailbox objects...
Networker is a good backup product. It's lightweight, and I haven't seen the client itself cause issues on any of our servers in the 11+ years I've used it. Like most enterprise products Networker needs to be setup properly and tuned for the environment...
Few options outside of the "EMC Approved" Methods to get the data to multiple locations to make the backups secure by holding in multiple ways. It seemed like using it more was leading us down a path of spending more and more money with EMC. The...
We've proven that this product persistently misses some files, but not always the same files, causing our Oracle DB recoveries to fail. Working with EMC support for months to years never resulted in a solution. Oracle DBA's refuse to rely on Networker...
