Compare Cucumber and Keysight Eggplant 
- Users report that Cucumber excels in test variety with a score of 8.8, allowing for a wide range of testing scenarios, while Keysight Eggplant, although strong, scores slightly lower at 8.5. Reviewers mention that Cucumber's ability to handle different types of tests makes it a versatile choice for teams.
- Reviewers mention that Keysight Eggplant shines in quality of support, achieving a score of 8.6 compared to Cucumber's 7.8. Users on G2 appreciate the responsive customer service and extensive documentation provided by Eggplant, which enhances their overall experience.
- Users say that Cucumber has a lower ease of setup score of 7.6, indicating that some users find it more challenging to get started compared to Keysight Eggplant, which scores 8.1. Reviewers mention that Eggplant's user-friendly interface simplifies the initial setup process.
- G2 users report that Keysight Eggplant offers superior functionality in terms of test feedback, scoring 8.4 versus Cucumber's 8.1. Users appreciate Eggplant's detailed feedback mechanisms that help in refining tests and improving outcomes.
- Users on G2 highlight that Cucumber's customization capabilities score 8.1, which allows teams to tailor their testing processes effectively. In contrast, Keysight Eggplant, while still effective, does not provide the same level of flexibility, leading some users to prefer Cucumber for specific project needs.
- Reviewers mention that while both products perform well in stress testing, Cucumber stands out with a score of 9.0, indicating a robust performance under pressure. Users report that this feature is crucial for teams that require rigorous testing environments.
- 30-day evaluation
- Customized for your needs
- Desktop trial
I am using cucumber as a BDD framework (Behavior Driven Development) . With cucumber we can define our test cases in simple Gerkhin language in our feature file and then can implement the test cases in Step Definition file. And we have a runner file to run...
difficult to implement and also integration with other tools
Eggplant's image-based testing approach sets it apart from traditional code-based automation tools. By capturing and analyzing screenshots of the application's user interface, Eggplant enables testers to interact with the application visually, simulating...
OCR not accurate despite the main feature. SenseTalk lacks exception handling. But If else conditions manage some exceptions. Screen resolution plays key role in object identification. Tool struggles when there are theme or resolution changes. There are...
I am using cucumber as a BDD framework (Behavior Driven Development) . With cucumber we can define our test cases in simple Gerkhin language in our feature file and then can implement the test cases in Step Definition file. And we have a runner file to run...
Eggplant's image-based testing approach sets it apart from traditional code-based automation tools. By capturing and analyzing screenshots of the application's user interface, Eggplant enables testers to interact with the application visually, simulating...
difficult to implement and also integration with other tools
OCR not accurate despite the main feature. SenseTalk lacks exception handling. But If else conditions manage some exceptions. Screen resolution plays key role in object identification. Tool struggles when there are theme or resolution changes. There are...
