Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Coverity and SonarQube 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (63.6% of reviews)
Enterprise (41.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free
Coverity
Star Rating
(55)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (63.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about CoveritySonarQube
Star Rating
(126)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (41.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Free Trial is available
Browse all 6 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that SonarQube excels in user satisfaction, boasting a significantly higher overall score compared to Coverity. Users appreciate its simple deployment process, especially when integrating with platforms like GitHub, which allows for seamless code scanning and feedback.
- Users say that SonarQube provides valuable code suggestions that enhance security and improve code quality. This feature is particularly praised for helping developers identify potential errors in their code flows, making it a strong choice for teams focused on maintaining high coding standards.
- Reviewers mention that while Coverity offers robust features for detecting code issues, it falls slightly behind SonarQube in overall user experience. However, users highlight its ability to optimize code and its effective debugging capabilities, which can lead to faster run times in projects.
- According to verified reviews, SonarQube has a larger volume of recent feedback, indicating a more active user base. This is reflected in the number of reviews, with SonarQube receiving 124 compared to Coverity's 55, suggesting that users are more engaged and satisfied with SonarQube's offerings.
- Users appreciate Coverity's quality of support, noting that the assistance provided is exceptional and helps resolve issues effectively. This support is a key strength for Coverity, making it a reliable option for teams that prioritize customer service.
- G2 reviewers highlight that while both tools have their strengths, SonarQube's ease of use and setup are notable advantages. Users find it intuitive, which is crucial for teams looking to implement a static code analysis tool without extensive training or onboarding.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Coverity
No pricing availableSonarQube
Cloud - based: Free
Free
For developers wanting to try SonarQube.
- Scan of private projects limited to 50k lines of code
- Users limited to max. 5
- Architecture management
Free Trial
Coverity
No trial information availableSonarQube
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
43
8.8
109
Ease of Use
8.4
43
8.5
112
Ease of Setup
8.2
19
8.1
71
Ease of Admin
8.2
19
8.5
63
Quality of Support
8.6
37
8.2
91
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.1
18
8.4
57
Product Direction (% positive)
7.7
40
8.6
106
Features by Category
Administration
8.3
11
7.8
19
9.0
12
6.0
20
Analysis
8.9
11
7.4
21
8.8
11
8.0
20
9.2
11
9.0
23
8.9
11
9.1
23
Testing
8.5
11
6.6
18
8.5
8
5.9
19
8.5
10
6.0
21
9.1
11
6.9
18
8.8
10
6.8
17
8.9
11
8.2
21
7.6
12
6.8
22
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.1
31
Not enough data
8.4
30
Not enough data
8.2
29
Management
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.5
25
Not enough data
7.8
27
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
7.7
10
Not enough data
8.0
10
Not enough data
8.3
10
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
7.8
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
8.5
10
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Documentation
9.3
5
7.8
36
9.3
5
7.6
35
8.7
5
8.2
36
Security
7.0
5
6.8
34
8.3
5
7.0
32
8.3
5
7.9
33
Risk management - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
8.9
6
Integration and efficiency - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Reporting and Analytics - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.3
5
Agentic AI - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Compliance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Risk Management & Monitoring
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Lifecycle Management
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Access Control and Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Collaboration and Communication
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Agentic AI - AI Governance Tools
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
6.3
8
Not enough data
5.7
7
Not enough data
6.7
8
Performance - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Coverity and SonarQube are categorized as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Static Code Analysis, and Secure Code Review
Unique Categories
Coverity has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Coverity
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SonarQube
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
36.4%
Information Technology and Services
12.7%
Telecommunications
9.1%
Computer & Network Security
7.3%
Semiconductors
5.5%
Other
29.1%
Information Technology and Services
27.2%
Computer Software
21.6%
Financial Services
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
3.2%
Computer & Network Security
3.2%
Other
38.4%
Alternatives
Discussions
Coverity has no discussions with answers
SonarQube has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
