- Home
- ...
- Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Software
- Coverity
- OpenText Fortify On Demand
- Coverity-vs-OpenText Fortify On Demand
Compare Coverity and OpenText Fortify On Demand 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (63.6% of reviews)
Enterprise (42.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Coverity
Star Rating
(56)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (63.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about CoverityOpenText Fortify On Demand
Star Rating
(35)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Fortify On DemandSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Coverity excels in Static Code Analysis with a score of 9.2, highlighting its ability to identify vulnerabilities early in the development process. In contrast, OpenText Fortify On Demand, while still strong, has a slightly lower score of 8.9 in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Coverity's Documentation is particularly robust, scoring 9.3, which aids users in understanding and utilizing the software effectively. OpenText Fortify On Demand does not have a specific score for documentation, leading to some uncertainty among users.
- G2 users indicate that Coverity's False Positives rate is a concern, with a score of 7.0, suggesting that users may need to spend additional time filtering out irrelevant alerts. OpenText Fortify On Demand has a slightly better score of 7.6, but both products could improve in this area.
- Users on G2 report that Coverity shines in Compliance Testing, achieving a high score of 9.1, which is crucial for organizations needing to meet regulatory standards. OpenText Fortify On Demand also performs well but scores a bit lower at 8.8.
- Reviewers mention that the Ease of Admin for OpenText Fortify On Demand is rated higher at 8.8 compared to Coverity's 8.2, indicating that users find it easier to manage and configure OpenText's solution.
- Users say that Coverity's Agility score of 8.3 reflects its adaptability in various development environments, while OpenText Fortify On Demand matches this score, suggesting both products are well-suited for agile development practices.
Featured Products
Sponsored
OX Security
(48)
Static Code Analysis
Visit Website
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Coverity
No pricing availableOpenText Fortify On Demand
No pricing availableFree Trial
Coverity
No trial information availableOpenText Fortify On Demand
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
43
8.1
32
Ease of Use
8.4
43
8.2
32
Ease of Setup
8.2
19
8.2
13
Ease of Admin
8.2
19
8.8
13
Quality of Support
8.6
37
8.0
31
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.1
18
8.8
13
Product Direction (% positive)
7.7
40
8.9
31
Features by Category
Administration
8.3
11
Not enough data
9.0
12
Not enough data
Analysis
8.9
11
Not enough data
8.8
11
Not enough data
9.2
11
Not enough data
8.9
11
Not enough data
Testing
8.5
11
Not enough data
8.5
8
Not enough data
8.5
10
Not enough data
9.1
11
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.9
11
Not enough data
7.6
12
Not enough data
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)Hide 13 FeaturesShow 13 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Documentation
9.3
5
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
Security
7.0
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Runtime Application Self-Protection (RASP) ToolsHide 4 FeaturesShow 4 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Threat Detection & Response - Runtime Application Self-Protection (RASP)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Coverity and OpenText Fortify On Demand are categorized as Static Code Analysis
Unique Categories
Coverity is categorized as Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and Secure Code Review
OpenText Fortify On Demand is categorized as Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST), and Runtime Application Self-Protection (RASP) Tools
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Coverity
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenText Fortify On Demand
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
36.4%
Information Technology and Services
12.7%
Telecommunications
9.1%
Computer & Network Security
7.3%
Semiconductors
5.5%
Other
29.1%
Information Technology and Services
25.7%
Computer Software
11.4%
Computer & Network Security
8.6%
Construction
5.7%
Airlines/Aviation
5.7%
Other
42.9%
Most Helpful Reviews
Coverity
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Nikhil D.
Verified User in Computer & Network Security
Its user friendly UI. It easy to browse code using Coverity and it also briefly describes about the issue.
Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Airlines/Aviation
No readme documents, tips should be attached with failure
OpenText Fortify On Demand
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Amir M.
Verified User in Airlines/Aviation
We use the HP Fortify on Demand SaaS, this allows us to free up resources from having to spend time maintaining the infrastructure. The product allows for RBAC, which helps in allowing appropriate access at all levels. We have implemented a process of...
Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Law Practice
Customer service has not been great. Not intuitive so takes some time to get really into it.
Nikhil D.
Verified User in Computer & Network Security
Its user friendly UI. It easy to browse code using Coverity and it also briefly describes about the issue.
Amir M.
Verified User in Airlines/Aviation
We use the HP Fortify on Demand SaaS, this allows us to free up resources from having to spend time maintaining the infrastructure. The product allows for RBAC, which helps in allowing appropriate access at all levels. We have implemented a process of...
Verified User in Airlines/Aviation
No readme documents, tips should be attached with failure
Verified User in Law Practice
Customer service has not been great. Not intuitive so takes some time to get really into it.
Alternatives
Discussions
Coverity has no discussions with answers
OpenText Fortify On Demand has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 2.5 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
or continue with
Gmail.com addresses not permitted. A business domain using Google is allowed.
By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy