- Home
- ...
- Static Code Analysis Tools
- Code Climate Quality
- SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
- Code Climate Quality-vs-SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Compare Code Climate Quality and SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) 
- Users report that SonarQube Server excels in Static Code Analysis with a score of 9.0, highlighting its ability to provide comprehensive insights into code quality. In contrast, Code Climate Quality falls short in this area, with a lower emphasis on static analysis features.
- Reviewers mention that SonarQube Server's Documentation is robust, particularly in Remediation Suggestions (8.2), which helps developers understand how to fix issues effectively. Users on G2 note that Code Climate Quality's documentation lacks depth, making it harder to navigate.
- G2 users indicate that SonarQube Server offers superior Integration with Development Tools, which enhances workflow efficiency. Users report that Code Climate Quality has limited integration capabilities, which can hinder seamless development processes.
- Reviewers say that SonarQube Server's Analytics and Trends feature (8.3) provides valuable insights into code quality over time, allowing teams to track improvements. In comparison, Code Climate Quality's analytics features are perceived as less comprehensive.
- Users report that SonarQube Server has a higher Quality of Support rating (8.0), with many reviewers praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team. Conversely, Code Climate Quality's support is often described as lacking, with users expressing frustration over response times.
- Reviewers mention that SonarQube Server's Ease of Setup (7.8) is generally straightforward, making it accessible for teams to implement quickly. In contrast, users on G2 find Code Climate Quality's setup process to be more cumbersome and less intuitive.
- Free
- Popular & classic languages support
- Integration with DevOps platforms
My favorite Code Climate feature is the test coverage reporting. Open source tools can easily provide total coverage metrics but the "diff-coverage" feature of Code Climate is really helpful to see what percentage of new code being added is not tested. The...
In practice, the scans don't really work out as well as you would hope. Nine times out of ten, the "violations" that it finds are either wrong or flawed in some way.
Our development process is helped alot by SonarQube as it will detect some bugs such as running out of memory, or simple error that we might not see at the first time. Our team is happy to use the product.
My experience as a SonarSource customer shows that they manifest little interest in small customers. In addition, their quality policy is poor when it comes to fixing major bugs in their code. For instance, this ticket has now been open for 1 year without...
My favorite Code Climate feature is the test coverage reporting. Open source tools can easily provide total coverage metrics but the "diff-coverage" feature of Code Climate is really helpful to see what percentage of new code being added is not tested. The...
Our development process is helped alot by SonarQube as it will detect some bugs such as running out of memory, or simple error that we might not see at the first time. Our team is happy to use the product.
In practice, the scans don't really work out as well as you would hope. Nine times out of ten, the "violations" that it finds are either wrong or flawed in some way.
My experience as a SonarSource customer shows that they manifest little interest in small customers. In addition, their quality policy is poor when it comes to fixing major bugs in their code. For instance, this ticket has now been open for 1 year without...
