Compare CloudNine LAW and Nextpoint 
- Reviews say that Nextpoint excels in document processing with a score of 9.4, highlighting its efficient handling of large volumes of data, while CloudNine LAW, although strong, has not received the same level of acclaim in this area.
- Users report that CloudNine LAW offers superior ease of use with a score of 9.2, making it more accessible for new users, whereas Nextpoint's score of 8.4 indicates a steeper learning curve.
- Reviewers mention that Nextpoint's document review feature scores 9.3, praised for its intuitive interface and robust functionality, while CloudNine LAW's automated review feature received a lower score of 6.4, suggesting it may not meet the needs of users looking for automation.
- G2 users highlight the quality of support for both products, with Nextpoint scoring 9.2 and CloudNine LAW slightly higher at 9.4, indicating that both companies are committed to providing excellent customer service, but CloudNine LAW edges out in this aspect.
- Users on G2 report that Nextpoint's permissioned access feature scores 8.9, allowing for granular control over document access, which is crucial for legal teams, while CloudNine LAW's similar feature has not been rated as highly, suggesting potential limitations in user access management.
- Reviewers mention that Nextpoint's project analytics feature scores 8.6, providing valuable insights into project performance, while CloudNine LAW's project templates received a lower score of 7.8, indicating that users may find Nextpoint's analytics more beneficial for tracking progress and outcomes.
Its the most user friendly review software I have ever used. Making the complex databases extremely easy to search/tag etc... In my 27 years of experience, I have found that their team of professionals is by far the best group I have ever worked with.
Per GB pricing is more expensive monthly hosting fees for larger volume databases. Not as good analytics as other software.
I liked being able to bulk code. Often there are documents that are not relevant to the project but take up a huge part of the folders. I appreciate being able to code those documents and move on without additional resources taking up time going through...
Not many features. Tagging and folders are pretty rudimentary, and it's very hard to organize and efficiently review duplicated documents. Also the search syntax is very simplistic.
Its the most user friendly review software I have ever used. Making the complex databases extremely easy to search/tag etc... In my 27 years of experience, I have found that their team of professionals is by far the best group I have ever worked with.
I liked being able to bulk code. Often there are documents that are not relevant to the project but take up a huge part of the folders. I appreciate being able to code those documents and move on without additional resources taking up time going through...
Per GB pricing is more expensive monthly hosting fees for larger volume databases. Not as good analytics as other software.
Not many features. Tagging and folders are pretty rudimentary, and it's very hard to organize and efficiently review duplicated documents. Also the search syntax is very simplistic.
