Compare CKEditor and TinyMCE 
- Users report that TinyMCE excels in responsive design with a score of 9.0, while CKEditor trails behind at 8.2. Reviewers mention that TinyMCE's adaptability across devices enhances user experience significantly.
- Reviewers say that TinyMCE's ease of setup is a standout feature, scoring 8.8 compared to CKEditor's 8.0. Users on G2 highlight that TinyMCE's straightforward installation process saves time and reduces frustration.
- G2 users note that TinyMCE offers superior collaborative editing capabilities with a score of 8.0, while CKEditor scores lower at 7.6. Users mention that TinyMCE's real-time collaboration features are particularly beneficial for teams working remotely.
- Users say that TinyMCE's plugin and integration options are robust, scoring 8.7, compared to CKEditor's 8.3. Reviewers mention that the variety of plugins available for TinyMCE allows for greater customization and functionality.
- Reviewers mention that TinyMCE's cross-platform support is impressive, scoring 8.8, while CKEditor scores 8.5. Users report that TinyMCE's compatibility with various operating systems enhances its usability across different environments.
- Users on G2 highlight that TinyMCE's quality of support is slightly lower at 8.1 compared to CKEditor's 8.3. However, reviewers mention that both products provide adequate support, with CKEditor being noted for its responsive customer service.
- 1,000 editor loads per month
- GPL2+ license
- Community support
- Core editing features
- 1,000 editor loads per month
- Cloud hosted
Integrating CKEditor into our product was a breeze. Probably took 0.01% of the time it'd take for us to implement it ourselves. It has tons of features out of the box and is easy to customize. Works with HTML great.
I'm not a fan of the toolbar. It's visible now, but it's always visible when the user scrolls the page down. And it gets annoying. The editor content is now placed inline in the page (without the surrounding <iframe> element) — it's harder to style.
TinyMCE has been an easy to work with WYSIWIG editor for a number of years. The best thing about Tiny is that fact that you can customize the tools, to suit your needs, whether you need all of the buttons or only a few, TinyMCE is an easy way for...
tl;dr: We had two pricing issues with TinyMCE. They think they could charge you anything because you already integrated their product. Don't make the mistake of integrating their product in the first place. Use a competitor with a transparent pricing. We...
Integrating CKEditor into our product was a breeze. Probably took 0.01% of the time it'd take for us to implement it ourselves. It has tons of features out of the box and is easy to customize. Works with HTML great.
TinyMCE has been an easy to work with WYSIWIG editor for a number of years. The best thing about Tiny is that fact that you can customize the tools, to suit your needs, whether you need all of the buttons or only a few, TinyMCE is an easy way for...
I'm not a fan of the toolbar. It's visible now, but it's always visible when the user scrolls the page down. And it gets annoying. The editor content is now placed inline in the page (without the surrounding <iframe> element) — it's harder to style.
tl;dr: We had two pricing issues with TinyMCE. They think they could charge you anything because you already integrated their product. Don't make the mistake of integrating their product in the first place. Use a competitor with a transparent pricing. We...
