Compare Civil 3D and OpenRoads Designer 
- Users report that Civil 3D excels in "Drawing" capabilities with a score of 9.2, making it a preferred choice for detailed design work, while OpenRoads Designer, with a score of 8.5, is noted for its solid performance but lacks the same level of precision in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Civil 3D's "Dynamic Updating" feature, rated at 8.8, allows for real-time changes that enhance workflow efficiency, whereas OpenRoads Designer, with a score of 8.7, offers similar functionality but is perceived as slightly less responsive.
- G2 users highlight that Civil 3D's "File Import/Export" functionality scores an impressive 9.1, facilitating seamless integration with other software, while OpenRoads Designer, although strong at 8.4, is sometimes reported to have compatibility issues with certain file types.
- Users on G2 indicate that Civil 3D's "Earthwork" capabilities, rated at 9.1, provide comprehensive tools for grading and excavation, whereas OpenRoads Designer, with a score of 8.9, is effective but may require additional steps for similar tasks.
- Reviewers say that Civil 3D's "Collaborate" feature, scoring 7.6, is less robust compared to OpenRoads Designer's 8.4, which is praised for its multi-user capabilities and ease of collaboration on projects.
- Users report that while both products have strong support ratings, Civil 3D's overall ease of use is rated at 7.4, which is higher than OpenRoads Designer's 6.8, indicating that Civil 3D may be more user-friendly for new users.
- Access to the latest version
- Use software anywhere
- Access previous versions
- A 1-year named user license of Bentley software for lower upfront costs
- 5 keys to redeem for customizable training, mentoring, and consulting services
- Direct access to in-house industry experts who know the challenges your team faces and the strategies to solve them
The program is very intuitive meaning buttons and ocmmands make sense. There are usually multiple ways to do a task and when I can't figure out something, usually a quick search online will net an an easy to apply answer. The problem is generally a lack...
Not enough characters, not much I like about the software. The surfaces are cumbersome and are difficult to use, especially when doing earthwork. No tool to use dview twist easier. No reason to use UCS if in Civil/Survey business except for very special...
Using Inroads to help us design roadways can quickly let the designer / engineer model their design against the existing features. It helps streamline the process of when and if retaining walls are needed and how long they need to be. Where drainage...
I dislike the complexity of the interface. Unless you have been using the software for quite some time it is hard to pick it up and know what you are doing. Even to shift a pad design 1 foot it takes an act of God, and quite some time. Inroads must be...
The program is very intuitive meaning buttons and ocmmands make sense. There are usually multiple ways to do a task and when I can't figure out something, usually a quick search online will net an an easy to apply answer. The problem is generally a lack...
Using Inroads to help us design roadways can quickly let the designer / engineer model their design against the existing features. It helps streamline the process of when and if retaining walls are needed and how long they need to be. Where drainage...
Not enough characters, not much I like about the software. The surfaces are cumbersome and are difficult to use, especially when doing earthwork. No tool to use dview twist easier. No reason to use UCS if in Civil/Survey business except for very special...
I dislike the complexity of the interface. Unless you have been using the software for quite some time it is hard to pick it up and know what you are doing. Even to shift a pad design 1 foot it takes an act of God, and quite some time. Inroads must be...
