- Home
- ...
- Endpoint Protection Suites
- Check Point Harmony Endpoint
- Cisco Anyconnect Secure Mobility Client
- Check Point Harmony Endpoint-vs-Cisco Anyconnect Secure Mobility Client
Compare Check Point Harmony Endpoint and Cisco Anyconnect Secure Mobility Client 
- Users report that Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels in Malware Detection with a score of 9.5, highlighting its robust capabilities in identifying and mitigating threats effectively. In contrast, Cisco Anyconnect Secure Mobility Client has a lower score of 8.9 in this area, indicating it may not be as strong in malware detection.
- Reviewers mention that Check Point's System Isolation feature, rated at 9.1, provides excellent protection by isolating compromised endpoints, which is crucial for maintaining network integrity. Cisco Anyconnect, while also offering system isolation, scored slightly lower at 8.9, suggesting it may not be as effective in this critical area.
- G2 users highlight Check Point's Endpoint Intelligence feature with a score of 9.4, which allows for advanced threat detection and response. Users on G2 note that Cisco Anyconnect's Endpoint Intelligence scored 9.1, indicating it is effective but may lack some of the advanced capabilities found in Check Point's offering.
- Reviewers mention that Check Point Harmony Endpoint's Compliance score of 9.2 reflects its strong alignment with regulatory requirements, making it a preferred choice for organizations focused on compliance. Cisco Anyconnect also performs well with a score of 9.3, but users report that Check Point provides more comprehensive compliance features.
- Users say that Check Point's Application Control feature, rated at 9.1, is highly effective in managing and controlling application usage, which is essential for security. Cisco Anyconnect's Application Control scored 9.1 as well, but reviewers mention that Check Point offers more granular control options.
- Users report that Check Point Harmony Endpoint's Quality of Support is rated at 8.8, with many praising the responsiveness and expertise of the support team. In comparison, Cisco Anyconnect's support scored higher at 9.0, indicating a slightly better user experience in terms of customer service.
Easy to deploy, much better user interface than competitors. provides easy vpn connections and protection for your endpoints with the NGAV capabilities.
Virtually everything - Clunky non-intuitive UI - almost non-existent integration with Smart Event; only a few events are available; most other alerts for common events have to be created as custom events - no out of box support for real-time...
It provides secure network access, which makes work from home more secure. It has an exquisite interface and is easy to use. It provides autoconnection, and we can which network is connected while it's auto-switched the network. It supports even very slow...
The client is very-very slow to start up Often loses connectivity to specific domains Loose integration with 2-factor authentication. e.g., one needs to type 'push' to get a push notification. An ideal VPN client would run in the background, with no...
Easy to deploy, much better user interface than competitors. provides easy vpn connections and protection for your endpoints with the NGAV capabilities.
It provides secure network access, which makes work from home more secure. It has an exquisite interface and is easy to use. It provides autoconnection, and we can which network is connected while it's auto-switched the network. It supports even very slow...
Virtually everything - Clunky non-intuitive UI - almost non-existent integration with Smart Event; only a few events are available; most other alerts for common events have to be created as custom events - no out of box support for real-time...
The client is very-very slow to start up Often loses connectivity to specific domains Loose integration with 2-factor authentication. e.g., one needs to type 'push' to get a push notification. An ideal VPN client would run in the background, with no...
