Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Amp and ChatGPT 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Zencoder.ai
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Ada
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Anima
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (70.8% of reviews)
Small-Business (62.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$59.00 1 User Per Year
No pricing available
Amp
Star Rating
(90)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (70.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$59.00 1 User Per Year
Learn more about AmpChatGPT
Star Rating
(1,161)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (62.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ChatGPTSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that ChatGPT excels in "Natural Conversation" with a score of 9.0, making it a preferred choice for those seeking a more human-like interaction, while Sourcegraph Cody, with a score of 8.2, is noted for its more technical and less conversational approach.
- Reviewers mention that ChatGPT's "Interface" is highly rated at 9.4, providing a user-friendly experience, whereas Sourcegraph Cody's interface, rated at 8.2, is considered less intuitive, which may hinder new users.
- G2 users highlight that ChatGPT's "Content Generation" capabilities, particularly in "Creativity" (8.9), allow for more innovative outputs compared to Sourcegraph Cody's lower score of 8.3 in "Content Accuracy," which some users feel lacks depth.
- Users on G2 indicate that ChatGPT's "Learning" features, especially "User Interaction Learning" (9.0), significantly enhance its adaptability, while Sourcegraph Cody's "Error Learning" (8.3) is seen as less effective in improving user experience over time.
- Reviewers mention that ChatGPT's "API Flexibility" (8.7) is a strong point, allowing for easier integration with other tools, while Sourcegraph Cody's integration capabilities, rated at 8.5, are viewed as more limited, which could affect workflow efficiency.
- Users say that ChatGPT's "Quality of Support" (8.6) is generally better than Sourcegraph Cody's (8.4), with many reviewers appreciating the responsiveness and helpfulness of ChatGPT's support team compared to the more average experiences reported with Sourcegraph Cody.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Amp
Enterprise
$59.00
1 User Per Year
AI & search with enterprise-level security, scalability, and flexibility
- Dedicated Cloud or Self-Hosted deployment
- Unlimited autocomplete and chat messages
- LLM Support & Flexible LLM choices including: Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4o, Gemini Pro and Flash Bring your own LLM key.
ChatGPT
No pricing availableFree Trial
Amp
Free Trial is available
ChatGPT
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.4
87
9.1
1,035
Ease of Use
8.6
87
9.6
1,077
Ease of Setup
8.9
82
9.6
653
Ease of Admin
8.2
10
9.4
106
Quality of Support
8.2
60
8.5
875
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.1
8
9.4
102
Product Direction (% positive)
9.1
87
9.4
1,050
Features by Category
Core Conversational Capabilities - AI Chatbots
Not enough data
9.0
80
Not enough data
8.9
79
Not enough data
9.0
81
Data
Not enough data
8.7
685
Not enough data
8.1
671
Interaction
Not enough data
8.6
679
Not enough data
8.9
676
Not enough data
8.8
670
Not enough data
8.7
664
Not enough data
8.5
661
Task & Flow Management - AI Chatbots
Not enough data
8.8
78
Not enough data
8.3
76
Learning
Not enough data
8.9
658
Not enough data
8.1
658
Deployment & Embedding - AI Chatbots
Not enough data
8.4
77
Not enough data
8.2
75
Content Generation
Not enough data
8.6
673
Not enough data
8.2
670
Admin & Configuration - AI Chatbots
Not enough data
8.7
76
System
Not enough data
8.4
629
Not enough data
8.5
642
Not enough data
8.5
636
Not enough data
8.4
625
Agentic AI - AI Chatbots
Not enough data
8.0
237
Not enough data
8.4
237
Not enough data
8.3
231
Not enough data
8.5
237
Not enough data
8.5
236
Not enough data
8.4
235
Not enough data
8.6
238
Monitoring & Improvement - AI Chatbots
Not enough data
8.5
77
Reliability & Safety - AI Chatbots
Not enough data
8.6
78
Functionality
7.6
67
8.4
318
8.1
67
8.8
314
8.3
66
9.3
311
8.0
66
8.7
314
Support
7.6
64
8.3
305
7.8
64
8.6
304
7.5
64
8.7
303
Agentic AI - AI Code Generation
Not enough data
8.5
83
Not enough data
8.8
83
Not enough data
9.1
83
Not enough data
8.6
83
Not enough data
8.7
82
Functionality - AI Coding Assistants
8.8
14
Not enough data
8.9
14
Not enough data
7.2
13
Not enough data
Usability - AI Coding Assistants
7.7
14
Not enough data
8.5
14
Not enough data
8.5
14
Not enough data
8.1
14
Not enough data
Documentation Generation - AI Documentation Generators
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Workflow and Integration - AI Documentation Generators
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Amp and ChatGPT are categorized as AI Code Generation
Unique Categories
Amp is categorized as AI Coding Assistants and AI Documentation Generators
ChatGPT is categorized as AI Chatbots
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Amp
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
ChatGPT
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
34.8%
Information Technology and Services
15.7%
Program Development
3.4%
Financial Services
3.4%
Marketing and Advertising
2.2%
Other
40.4%
Information Technology and Services
14.4%
Computer Software
13.5%
Marketing and Advertising
8.3%
Higher Education
3.9%
Education Management
3.9%
Other
56.0%
Discussions
Amp has no discussions with answers
🧠 Is AI Weakening Human Critical Thinking? Let’s Talk.
3 Comments
MM
Yes, as long as the user is not evaluating and sutdying the output, AI is weaking the critical thinking.Read more
ChatGPT has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
