2026 Best Software Awards are here!See the list
Compare Castor and Clinical Research Suite 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (48.8% of reviews)
Enterprise (54.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Pay As You Go
Castor
Star Rating
(126)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (48.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about CastorClinical Research Suite
Star Rating
(205)3.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (54.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Pay As You Go
Browse all 2 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that Castor excels in overall user satisfaction, reflected in its higher G2 Score compared to Clinical Research Suite. Users appreciate features like the clear data collection progress list and the ability to flag missing entries, which significantly enhances data management.
- Users say that Castor's interface is intuitive and easy to navigate, making it simpler to add subject data. In contrast, while Clinical Research Suite is described as user-friendly, some users find it less efficient for their specific workflows, indicating potential configuration challenges.
- According to verified reviews, Castor's implementation process is praised for its quick onboarding, with users highlighting the ease of setup. On the other hand, Clinical Research Suite, while functional, has received mixed feedback regarding its setup process, with some users noting it could be more streamlined.
- Reviewers mention that Castor provides robust support, with high ratings for quality and responsiveness. Users feel that the platform acts as a good partner in their research efforts, whereas Clinical Research Suite's support has been described as adequate but not as highly rated, leading to some user frustration.
- Users highlight Castor's strong compliance and security features, which are crucial for electronic data capture. The platform's two-step authorization and detailed audit trails are particularly appreciated. In comparison, while Clinical Research Suite offers security measures, users have noted that it doesn't match the level of assurance provided by Castor.
- G2 reviewers indicate that Castor's ability to meet user requirements is significantly higher, with features that align closely with user needs, such as effective query management and data export capabilities. Clinical Research Suite, while functional, has been reported to struggle in these areas, leading to a less satisfying user experience overall.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Castor
No pricing availableClinical Research Suite
Pricing Model 1: On Demand
Pay As You Go
Get a Cost Estimate within 1 minute ➞https://my-researchmanager.com/en/on-demand/
- For fewer than 5 ongoing projects
- Perfect entry model with our pay-as-you-go plan.
- Transparent Pricing Matrix
Free Trial
Castor
Free Trial is available
Clinical Research Suite
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
113
7.8
186
Ease of Use
9.3
116
7.5
191
Ease of Setup
8.8
42
7.6
154
Ease of Admin
9.3
32
7.7
18
Quality of Support
9.2
100
7.6
125
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.3
30
8.3
14
Product Direction (% positive)
9.5
115
8.2
186
Features by Category
Data Management
9.2
93
8.0
48
9.3
95
7.5
50
8.8
91
7.5
49
8.8
88
7.5
48
Clinical Study Support
9.2
93
7.7
49
8.9
91
7.5
48
9.4
91
7.6
49
8.8
88
7.4
50
9.1
90
7.9
49
Operational Data
Not enough data
7.2
132
Not enough data
6.9
132
Not enough data
7.4
130
Not enough data
6.6
126
Operational Performance
Not enough data
7.3
131
Not enough data
7.5
131
Not enough data
7.2
131
Not enough data
6.9
126
Content Management
Not enough data
7.1
8
Not enough data
7.0
9
Not enough data
7.0
9
Not enough data
7.2
9
Not enough data
7.0
9
Not enough data
7.6
9
Not enough data
7.0
9
Regulatory Compliance
Not enough data
7.0
9
Not enough data
7.2
9
Not enough data
7.5
8
Not enough data
7.3
8
Regulatory Information Management (RIM) SystemsHide 13 FeaturesShow 13 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Document Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Regulatory Affairs
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Castor and Clinical Research Suite are categorized as Electronic Data Capture (EDC)
Unique Categories
Castor has no unique categories
Clinical Research Suite is categorized as Clinical Trial Management Systems, Electronic Trial Master File (eTMF), and Regulatory Information Management (RIM) Systems
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Castor
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Clinical Research Suite
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Hospital & Health Care
48.0%
Research
20.8%
Medical Practice
12.0%
Health, Wellness and Fitness
6.4%
Medical Devices
4.0%
Other
8.8%
Hospital & Health Care
46.6%
Research
19.1%
Medical Practice
16.7%
Health, Wellness and Fitness
6.4%
Mental Health Care
4.9%
Other
6.4%
Discussions
Castor has no discussions with answers
Clinical Research Suite has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
