Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Canonical MicroK8s and KubeSphere Container Platform 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (58.8% of reviews)
Small-Business (33.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Canonical MicroK8s
Star Rating
(17)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (58.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Canonical MicroK8sKubeSphere Container Platform
Star Rating
(12)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (33.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about KubeSphere Container PlatformSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Canonical MicroK8s excels in ease of setup, with a score of 9.5, making it particularly appealing for small businesses looking for a quick deployment solution. In contrast, KubeSphere Container Platform, while still user-friendly, has a slightly lower ease of use rating at 9.1, which may require more time for initial configuration.
- Reviewers mention that Canonical MicroK8s offers robust self-healing capabilities, ensuring high availability, which is crucial for production environments. KubeSphere, while it does provide high availability features, has received mixed feedback regarding its orchestration capabilities, with some users noting that it can be less intuitive.
- G2 users highlight the automatic security updates feature in Canonical MicroK8s, which helps maintain system integrity without manual intervention. Conversely, KubeSphere's security updates are noted to be less frequent, leading some users to express concerns about potential vulnerabilities.
- Users on G2 appreciate the strong community support surrounding Canonical MicroK8s, which contributes to its high quality of support rating of 8.3. KubeSphere, with a slightly lower support rating of 8.1, has been described by some users as having slower response times for technical inquiries.
- Reviewers say that Canonical MicroK8s shines in its scalability, allowing users to easily scale applications as needed. KubeSphere, while also scalable, has been reported to face challenges in managing larger deployments effectively, which could be a concern for growing businesses.
- Users report that Canonical MicroK8s has a clear product direction with a perfect score of 10.0, indicating strong confidence in its future development. In contrast, KubeSphere's product direction score of 7.4 has led some users to question its long-term viability and feature enhancements.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Canonical MicroK8s
No pricing availableKubeSphere Container Platform
No pricing availableFree Trial
Canonical MicroK8s
No trial information availableKubeSphere Container Platform
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.8
10
8.8
8
Ease of Use
9.5
10
9.1
9
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.3
8
8.1
7
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
7
7.4
9
Features by Category
Application Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
System Capability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Canonical MicroK8s and KubeSphere Container Platform are categorized as Container Engine
Unique Categories
Canonical MicroK8s has no unique categories
KubeSphere Container Platform has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Canonical MicroK8s
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
KubeSphere Container Platform
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
47.1%
Information Technology and Services
23.5%
Financial Services
11.8%
Telecommunications
5.9%
Education Management
5.9%
Other
5.9%
Information Technology and Services
25.0%
Computer Software
16.7%
Restaurants
8.3%
Investment Banking
8.3%
Internet
8.3%
Other
33.3%
Alternatives
Discussions
Canonical MicroK8s has no discussions with answers
If we need to install kubesphere on windows how it is possible?
1 Comment
FZ
Hi, KubeSphere is not fully supported on Windows now. May I know the reason why you want to install KubeSphere on Windows? Read more
KubeSphere Container Platform has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
