- Home
- ...
- Container Engine Software
- Canonical MicroK8s
- KubeSphere Container Platform
- Canonical MicroK8s-vs-KubeSphere Container Platform
Compare Canonical MicroK8s and KubeSphere Container Platform 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (58.8% of reviews)
Small-Business (33.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Canonical MicroK8s
Star Rating
(17)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (58.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Canonical MicroK8sKubeSphere Container Platform
Star Rating
(12)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (33.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about KubeSphere Container PlatformSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Canonical MicroK8s excels in ease of setup, with a score of 9.5, making it particularly appealing for small businesses looking for a quick deployment solution. In contrast, KubeSphere Container Platform, while still user-friendly, has a slightly lower ease of use rating at 9.1.
- Reviewers mention that Canonical MicroK8s offers robust self-healing high availability features, which are crucial for maintaining uptime in production environments. KubeSphere, while it has high availability capabilities, does not match the seamlessness of MicroK8s in this area.
- G2 users highlight the superior product direction of Canonical MicroK8s, scoring a perfect 10.0, indicating strong confidence in its future development and support. KubeSphere, on the other hand, has a lower score of 7.4, suggesting some uncertainty among users regarding its roadmap.
- Users on G2 report that Canonical MicroK8s provides automatic security updates, which is a significant advantage for organizations prioritizing security. KubeSphere does offer security updates, but users have noted that they are not as frequent or automatic as those provided by MicroK8s.
- Reviewers mention that Canonical MicroK8s shines in its application support, particularly for IoT and edge computing scenarios, making it a preferred choice for developers in those fields. KubeSphere, while versatile, is often seen as more tailored for traditional cloud-native applications.
- Users say that the quality of support for Canonical MicroK8s is rated at 8.3, which is slightly higher than KubeSphere's 8.1, indicating that users feel more supported when using MicroK8s, especially during critical deployment phases.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Canonical MicroK8s
No pricing availableKubeSphere Container Platform
No pricing availableFree Trial
Canonical MicroK8s
No trial information availableKubeSphere Container Platform
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.8
10
8.8
8
Ease of Use
9.5
10
9.1
9
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.3
8
8.1
7
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
7
7.4
9
Features by Category
Application Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
System Capability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Canonical MicroK8s and KubeSphere Container Platform are categorized as Container Engine
Unique Categories
Canonical MicroK8s has no unique categories
KubeSphere Container Platform has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Canonical MicroK8s
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
KubeSphere Container Platform
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
47.1%
Information Technology and Services
23.5%
Financial Services
11.8%
Telecommunications
5.9%
Education Management
5.9%
Other
5.9%
Information Technology and Services
25.0%
Computer Software
16.7%
Restaurants
8.3%
Investment Banking
8.3%
Internet
8.3%
Other
33.3%
Most Helpful Reviews
Canonical MicroK8s
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Shishir B.
Verified User in Financial Services
- Cross-platform support -Zero downtime deployments - Self-healing & reconciliation features - lightweight cluster footprint - Networking options (Istio, Ingress, etc.)
Most Helpful Critical Review
KubeSphere Container Platform
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Verified User in Information Services
Multiple handling with easy to use and manage the node
Most Helpful Critical Review
Shishir B.
Verified User in Financial Services
- Cross-platform support -Zero downtime deployments - Self-healing & reconciliation features - lightweight cluster footprint - Networking options (Istio, Ingress, etc.)
Verified User in Information Services
Multiple handling with easy to use and manage the node
Alternatives
Discussions
Canonical MicroK8s has no discussions with answers
If we need to install kubesphere on windows how it is possible?
1 comment
FZ
Hi, KubeSphere is not fully supported on Windows now. May I know the reason why you want to install KubeSphere on Windows? Read more
KubeSphere Container Platform has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 2.5 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
or continue with
Gmail.com addresses not permitted. A business domain using Google is allowed.
By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy