Compare BugSnag and Rollbar 
- Users report that Rollbar excels in "Constant Monitoring" with a score of 9.3, providing real-time insights that help teams address issues promptly, while BugSnag, although strong, has a slightly lower score of 8.3 in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Rollbar's "Quality of Support" is highly rated at 9.2, indicating a responsive and helpful support team, whereas BugSnag's support quality is rated at 8.8, suggesting it may not be as robust in comparison.
- G2 users highlight that Rollbar's "Timely Alerts" feature scores an impressive 9.5, ensuring that teams are notified of issues as they arise, while BugSnag's alerts, although effective, score slightly lower at 8.5.
- Users on G2 report that BugSnag shines in "Bug History" with a score of 9.7, providing detailed insights into past issues, which is crucial for long-term project management, while Rollbar's score of 9.2 is still commendable but not as high.
- Reviewers mention that Rollbar's "User Reports and Feedback" feature is rated at 8.3, which helps teams gather insights directly from users, while BugSnag's similar feature is rated at 8.9, indicating a stronger capability in this area.
- Users say that Rollbar's "Product Direction" score of 7.6 reflects a solid vision for future updates, although BugSnag's score of 7.4 suggests it may be slightly less clear in its roadmap, which could impact long-term user confidence.
- Unlimited monitored apps
- Automatic error capture and end-to-end diagnostics
- Error inbox with search & filtering
- 5,000 error events monthly
- Real-time feed and alerts
- Intelligent error grouping
The fast way to capture unhandled and processing mistakes. great that I can automatically collect diagnostic information. Also, I guess the more important step that I can see how many times an fault happens.
The information Bugsnag captures in Go isn't that useful. Stack traces can be misleading. I'd like to track multiple levels of log in Bugsnag but not necessarily report them all through to Pagerduty (i.e. I'd like to also capture warnings but not have them...
The best part about Rollbar is the very well balanced UI that allows you to see all errors tracked for various environments including testing, staging, and production. I love how easy it is to integrate with many different languages. Tracking client side...
Version support is important even (or especially) for early stage projects thus the only option is to jump in to advanced plan ... Or just go to alternative solution being good enough for start and beyond. Also got disappointed finding out there is no...
The fast way to capture unhandled and processing mistakes. great that I can automatically collect diagnostic information. Also, I guess the more important step that I can see how many times an fault happens.
The best part about Rollbar is the very well balanced UI that allows you to see all errors tracked for various environments including testing, staging, and production. I love how easy it is to integrate with many different languages. Tracking client side...
The information Bugsnag captures in Go isn't that useful. Stack traces can be misleading. I'd like to track multiple levels of log in Bugsnag but not necessarily report them all through to Pagerduty (i.e. I'd like to also capture warnings but not have them...
Version support is important even (or especially) for early stage projects thus the only option is to jump in to advanced plan ... Or just go to alternative solution being good enough for start and beyond. Also got disappointed finding out there is no...
