- Home
- ...
- Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) Software
- Bright Security
- StackHawk
- Bright Security-vs-StackHawk
Compare Bright Security and StackHawk 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (56.0% of reviews)
Small-Business (44.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
$42.00 1 Code Contributor Per Month
Bright Security
Star Rating
(25)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (56.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Bright SecurityStackHawk
Star Rating
(67)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (44.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$42.00 1 Code Contributor Per Month
Free Trial is available
Browse all 3 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that StackHawk excels in its API / Integrations with a score of 9.4, making it easier for developers to connect with other tools. In contrast, Bright Security has a lower score of 8.9 in this area, which may limit integration capabilities for some users.
- Reviewers mention that StackHawk's automated scans score 8.7, providing a reliable way to identify vulnerabilities without manual intervention. Bright Security, while still effective, has a slightly lower score of 8.8, indicating that users may find StackHawk's automation more robust.
- G2 users highlight StackHawk's quality of support with a score of 9.3, suggesting that users feel well-supported during their experience. Bright Security also has a strong support score of 9.4, but the difference is minimal, indicating both products are reliable in this aspect.
- Users on G2 report that StackHawk's vulnerability assessment feature scores 8.6, which is slightly lower than Bright Security's score of 8.8. This suggests that Bright Security may offer a more comprehensive approach to identifying and managing vulnerabilities.
- Reviewers say that StackHawk shines in its ease of use with a score of 9.1, making it user-friendly for teams of all sizes. Bright Security, while still user-friendly, has a lower score of 8.6, which may indicate a steeper learning curve for new users.
- Users report that StackHawk's performance in issue tracking is rated at 8.2, while Bright Security has a higher score of 8.3. This indicates that Bright Security may provide a slightly better experience in tracking and managing issues effectively.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Bright Security
No pricing availableStackHawk
Pro
$42.00
1 Code Contributor Per Month
StackHawks Pro plan offers unlimited scans and environments for up to 50 applications. Email and Slack based support included.
- Unlimited scans and environments
- Unlimited applications
- Docker based application security scanner
Free Trial
Bright Security
No trial information availableStackHawk
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.4
20
8.8
52
Ease of Use
8.6
20
9.0
52
Ease of Setup
8.4
17
8.3
32
Ease of Admin
9.2
12
8.9
29
Quality of Support
9.4
20
9.3
48
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.3
12
9.2
26
Product Direction (% positive)
9.4
20
9.4
41
Features by Category
Administration
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Risk Analysis
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.6
7
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Threat Protection
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Generative AI
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
9.4
11
Not enough data
9.3
9
Not enough data
9.4
11
Analysis
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
9.1
9
Not enough data
9.4
9
Testing
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
9.1
11
Not enough data
9.3
10
Not enough data
9.3
10
Administration
8.4
17
8.8
28
8.2
16
8.5
27
Analysis
8.2
18
8.2
31
8.3
17
8.3
27
6.3
12
Feature Not Available
8.8
17
9.1
30
6.1
11
Feature Not Available
Testing
6.5
12
7.3
28
8.9
17
8.8
30
8.9
14
7.9
28
9.1
16
8.4
27
8.2
14
8.1
30
7.3
16
7.3
30
Performance
Not enough data
8.3
21
Not enough data
8.7
22
Not enough data
7.7
22
Not enough data
8.7
25
Network
Feature Not Available
8.2
19
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
Application
Not enough data
8.2
21
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.6
18
API Management
Not enough data
8.3
9
Not enough data
9.1
9
Not enough data
7.7
10
Not enough data
8.1
8
Security Testing
Not enough data
6.9
8
Not enough data
9.3
9
Not enough data
9.3
10
Security Management
Not enough data
8.5
9
Not enough data
7.5
8
Not enough data
6.9
8
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Bright Security and StackHawk are categorized as Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) and Vulnerability Scanner
Unique Categories
Bright Security is categorized as Website Security
StackHawk is categorized as Penetration Testing and API Security
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Bright Security
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
StackHawk
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer & Network Security
36.0%
Information Technology and Services
24.0%
Financial Services
8.0%
Banking
8.0%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
4.0%
Other
20.0%
Information Technology and Services
23.1%
Computer Software
18.5%
Computer & Network Security
9.2%
Financial Services
4.6%
Banking
4.6%
Other
40.0%
Most Helpful Reviews
Bright Security
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Rodrigo B.
Verified User in Apparel & Fashion
Complete platform for DAST. With good false-positive accuracy. I also liked the amount of configurations we can make. Among other DAST tools I've used, I prefer this one. I recommend.
Most Helpful Critical Review
StackHawk
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Viktor H.
Verified User in Construction
The onboarding process to get the tests running is very helpful. The StackHawk employees take the time if you have questions, and they are very willing to help. I like the technology of the test tool.
Most Helpful Critical Review
Rodrigo B.
Verified User in Apparel & Fashion
Complete platform for DAST. With good false-positive accuracy. I also liked the amount of configurations we can make. Among other DAST tools I've used, I prefer this one. I recommend.
Viktor H.
Verified User in Construction
The onboarding process to get the tests running is very helpful. The StackHawk employees take the time if you have questions, and they are very willing to help. I like the technology of the test tool.
Alternatives
Discussions
Bright Security has no discussions with answers
StackHawk has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 2.5 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
or continue with
Gmail.com addresses not permitted. A business domain using Google is allowed.
By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
