Compare Bamboo and Octopus Deploy 
- Users report that Bamboo excels in its integration capabilities, particularly with tools like JIRA and Bitbucket, making it a preferred choice for teams already using Atlassian products. In contrast, Octopus Deploy is noted for its robust deployment automation features, allowing for seamless deployment across multiple environments.
- Reviewers mention that Bamboo's user interface is intuitive, which contributes to its ease of use rating of 8.2. However, Octopus Deploy has a slightly higher ease of use rating at 8.5, with users appreciating its straightforward setup process for deployment pipelines.
- G2 users highlight Bamboo's strong configuration management features, scoring 8.5, which allows for effective management of build configurations. On the other hand, Octopus Deploy shines in deployment automation with a score of 9.6, making it ideal for teams focused on continuous delivery.
- Users on G2 report that Bamboo's dashboards are highly customizable, scoring 8.7, which helps teams visualize their workflows effectively. In comparison, Octopus Deploy's workflow visualization is rated at 8.3, with users noting that while it is functional, it lacks some of the customization options found in Bamboo.
- Reviewers say that Octopus Deploy has a strong focus on error management in automation, with features that allow for detailed recovery options and runbook procedure updates, which are crucial for maintaining uptime. Bamboo, while effective, does not emphasize error management to the same extent.
- Users report that both products have solid support, but Octopus Deploy edges out with a quality of support rating of 8.2 compared to Bamboo's 8.0. Reviewers mention that Octopus Deploy's support team is responsive and knowledgeable, which enhances the overall user experience.
- Up to 10 jobs, Unlimited local agents, No remote agents
- No servers, no storage, no maintenance
- First-class support and customer service
- 24/7 monitoring and automatically backed up
The integrations with the other Atlassian tools (BitBucket, JIRA, and Confluence) work with no effort, right out of the box. The ability to set fine-grain access control for the deployment phase for each target environment is great. As a public...
A little confusing getting to a specific running job from the main job list, I often find myself looking at the previously-completed job instead of the currently running one.
Octopus vastly simplifies the deployment of Windows-based services and websites. What used to be an hour long process of copying files around manually and editing config files is all automated into a process that takes a fraction of the time. The lifecycle...
My biggest complaint is that it must be manually installed on each deployment machine, there is no hosted service for this. Maintaining Octopus itself becomes a problem with time, with manual up-gradation required on each machine. There is also no facility...
The integrations with the other Atlassian tools (BitBucket, JIRA, and Confluence) work with no effort, right out of the box. The ability to set fine-grain access control for the deployment phase for each target environment is great. As a public...
Octopus vastly simplifies the deployment of Windows-based services and websites. What used to be an hour long process of copying files around manually and editing config files is all automated into a process that takes a fraction of the time. The lifecycle...
A little confusing getting to a specific running job from the main job list, I often find myself looking at the previously-completed job instead of the currently running one.
My biggest complaint is that it must be manually installed on each deployment machine, there is no hosted service for this. Maintaining Octopus itself becomes a problem with time, with manual up-gradation required on each machine. There is also no facility...
