Compare Babylon and DeepL 
- Users report that Babylon's "Direct Text Translation" feature scores a solid 9.1, but reviewers mention that DeepL excels with a higher overall quality in translations, reflected in its 4.6 star rating compared to Babylon's 3.7.
- Reviewers mention that DeepL's "Ease of Setup" is particularly impressive, scoring 9.3, while Babylon lacks a clear score in this area, indicating a potentially more complex setup process.
- G2 users highlight that DeepL's "Quality of Support" is rated at 8.1, significantly better than Babylon's 4.8, suggesting that users may find more reliable assistance with DeepL when issues arise.
- Users on G2 report that DeepL's "Machine + Human Translation" feature, rated at 8.9, provides a more nuanced translation experience, while Babylon's offerings in this area are less emphasized, leading to concerns about translation accuracy.
- Reviewers mention that Babylon's "Pay-Per-Use" model scores only 6.6, which may deter users looking for flexible pricing, whereas DeepL offers a free tier, making it more accessible for small businesses.
- Users say that while both products offer "Document Translation," DeepL's overall user experience and higher ratings in "Ease of Use" (9.2) suggest a more intuitive interface for handling documents compared to Babylon.
- Limited text translation
- 3 non-editable file translations per month
- Upload files up to 5 MB in size
I've been using Babylon for a couple of years now, and I can just say it is an excellent tool for work and academic translation duties.
double clicked translation not work last installation
I like the accuracy DeepL displays when translating entire documents. This tool competes in a very saturated space but has still managed to stand out despite so many competitors.
Obviously, DeepL meant to exclude the Traditional Chinese language, it's either by demand or merely misunderstands that Simplified Chinese and Traditional Chinese are the same languages using the same characters and phrases. Unfortunately, the product...
I've been using Babylon for a couple of years now, and I can just say it is an excellent tool for work and academic translation duties.
I like the accuracy DeepL displays when translating entire documents. This tool competes in a very saturated space but has still managed to stand out despite so many competitors.
double clicked translation not work last installation
Obviously, DeepL meant to exclude the Traditional Chinese language, it's either by demand or merely misunderstands that Simplified Chinese and Traditional Chinese are the same languages using the same characters and phrases. Unfortunately, the product...
