- Home
- ...
- Cloud Cost Management Tools
- AWS Cost Explorer
- VMware Tanzu CloudHealth
- AWS Cost Explorer-vs-VMware Tanzu CloudHealth
Compare AWS Cost Explorer and VMware Tanzu CloudHealth 
- Users report that VMware Tanzu CloudHealth excels in "Usage Monitoring" with a score of 9.2, indicating strong capabilities in tracking resource utilization across multiple cloud environments, while AWS Cost Explorer, although effective, does not emphasize this feature as strongly.
- Reviewers mention that AWS Cost Explorer shines in "Ease of Setup" with a score of 9.2, making it a preferred choice for users who prioritize quick deployment and minimal configuration, whereas VMware Tanzu CloudHealth has not been rated in this area.
- G2 users highlight that VMware Tanzu CloudHealth offers robust "Spend Tracking" features with a score of 9.2, allowing for detailed insights into cloud expenditures, while AWS Cost Explorer, while effective, has a slightly lower emphasis on this functionality.
- Users on G2 report that AWS Cost Explorer has a higher "Quality of Support" rating at 8.8, with many reviewers praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, compared to VMware Tanzu CloudHealth's score of 9.0, which is still strong but slightly less favorable.
- Reviewers mention that VMware Tanzu CloudHealth's "Recommendations" feature, rated at 7.8, could be improved, as some users feel that the suggestions provided are not as actionable or tailored as those from AWS Cost Explorer, which benefits from a more intuitive recommendation engine.
- Users say that both products have their strengths in "Cloud Cost Analytics," but AWS Cost Explorer's user-friendly dashboards and visualizations, rated at 9.2, are often highlighted as superior, making it easier for users to interpret data and make informed decisions.
- Many filter options to allowing viewing cost by services, accounts, running hours and usage, monthly or daily - The charts help visualize the trends of cost (increasing / decreasing) - Allow saving reports filter so I don't need to set same filter next...
I think the UI could be made better as it have many details while it can be divided into more subpages.
I like that is helps my organization to optimize costs and to keep budgeting proposals and documentation organized. Additionally it allows for collaboration among colleagues in different departments and provides a shared output goal.
Connectivity. With other VMware products, I've always had connectivity/speed issues and its the same unfortunate case here as well. Sometimes the screen will lag for a few seconds and have had it freeze on me for a minute or two before.
- Many filter options to allowing viewing cost by services, accounts, running hours and usage, monthly or daily - The charts help visualize the trends of cost (increasing / decreasing) - Allow saving reports filter so I don't need to set same filter next...
I like that is helps my organization to optimize costs and to keep budgeting proposals and documentation organized. Additionally it allows for collaboration among colleagues in different departments and provides a shared output goal.
I think the UI could be made better as it have many details while it can be divided into more subpages.
Connectivity. With other VMware products, I've always had connectivity/speed issues and its the same unfortunate case here as well. Sometimes the screen will lag for a few seconds and have had it freeze on me for a minute or two before.
