- Home
- ...
- Cloud Workload Protection Platforms
- AWS Control Tower
- Microsoft Defender for Cloud
- AWS Control Tower-vs-Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Compare AWS Control Tower and Microsoft Defender for Cloud 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.0% of reviews)
Mid-Market (37.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial
AWS Control Tower
Star Rating
(20)3.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about AWS Control TowerMicrosoft Defender for Cloud
Star Rating
(302)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (37.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free Trial
Learn more about Microsoft Defender for CloudSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Microsoft Defender for Cloud excels in Risk Scoring with a score of 9.5, indicating a robust ability to assess and prioritize security risks effectively, while AWS Control Tower lacks a comparable feature in this area.
- Reviewers mention that the Compliance Monitoring feature in AWS Control Tower is rated highly at 9.2, providing comprehensive oversight for regulatory requirements, whereas Microsoft Defender for Cloud's compliance monitoring is slightly lower at 8.9.
- G2 users highlight that Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers superior Security Auditing capabilities with a score of 8.9, which helps organizations maintain a clear audit trail, while AWS Control Tower's auditing features are rated higher at 9.3, showcasing its strength in this area.
- Users on G2 report that the Administration Console in AWS Control Tower is particularly user-friendly, scoring 9.7, making it easier for administrators to manage their cloud environment compared to Microsoft Defender for Cloud's score of 8.7.
- Reviewers say that Microsoft Defender for Cloud shines in Security Automation with a score of 8.5, allowing for streamlined security processes, while AWS Control Tower does not have a comparable feature, which may limit automation capabilities.
- Users report that the Data Loss Prevention feature in AWS Control Tower is rated at 9.3, indicating strong capabilities in protecting sensitive information, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud's score of 8.6 suggests it may not be as effective in this critical area.
Featured Products
Sponsored
SafeBase
(124)
Secure Code Review
Visit Website
Sponsored
OX Security
(48)
Secure Code Review
Visit Website
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
AWS Control Tower
No pricing availableMicrosoft Defender for Cloud
Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Free Trial
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/defender-for-cloud/
- Unified visibility of your security posture across Azure, AWS, Google Cloud, and hybrid clouds
- Real-time security access and prioritization of the most critical risks with context-aware cloud security
- Integrated extended detection and response (XDR) solution across multicloud workloads to prevent, detect, and respond to attacks
Free Trial
AWS Control Tower
No trial information availableMicrosoft Defender for Cloud
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.2
14
8.8
228
Ease of Use
7.9
15
8.7
230
Ease of Setup
7.6
9
8.6
130
Ease of Admin
7.5
8
8.8
116
Quality of Support
8.8
13
8.6
222
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
8
8.5
113
Product Direction (% positive)
7.3
13
9.6
218
Features by Category
Management
9.7
5
9.1
44
Not enough data
8.5
44
9.7
5
8.7
43
Operations
9.7
5
8.9
43
9.0
5
8.7
44
9.7
5
8.5
44
Security Controls
9.7
5
8.6
44
9.3
5
8.6
43
9.3
5
8.9
43
9.7
5
8.6
43
Administration
Not enough data
9.5
22
Not enough data
9.2
21
Not enough data
9.1
23
Not enough data
9.2
22
Monitoring
Not enough data
9.1
20
Not enough data
9.0
21
Not enough data
9.5
20
Protection
Not enough data
9.0
19
Not enough data
9.0
21
Not enough data
9.3
22
Not enough data
9.4
21
Security
9.2
8
8.9
92
8.5
8
8.7
92
8.6
7
8.6
91
8.1
7
8.7
91
Compliance
8.8
8
8.7
92
9.0
8
8.6
89
8.8
8
8.9
90
Administration
9.0
8
8.7
89
8.8
7
8.7
90
7.8
6
8.7
89
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
9.5
13
Not enough data
9.9
13
Not enough data
9.7
13
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
9.6
13
Not enough data
10.0
13
Not enough data
9.6
13
Activity Monitoring
Not enough data
8.5
61
Not enough data
8.4
60
Not enough data
8.4
61
Not enough data
8.6
59
Security
Not enough data
8.6
60
Not enough data
7.9
58
Not enough data
8.4
60
Administration
Not enough data
8.5
58
Not enough data
8.1
59
Not enough data
8.1
58
Documentation
Not enough data
9.2
17
Not enough data
8.7
17
Not enough data
9.3
16
Security
Not enough data
8.4
16
Not enough data
9.1
18
Not enough data
9.4
16
Configuration
Not enough data
8.5
60
Not enough data
8.8
61
Not enough data
8.6
57
Not enough data
8.6
58
Not enough data
8.4
62
Visibility
Not enough data
8.5
61
Not enough data
8.8
57
Vulnerability Management
Not enough data
8.6
60
Not enough data
8.9
59
Not enough data
8.7
60
Not enough data
8.7
60
Alerts management
Not enough data
8.1
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
7.7
8
Monitoring
Not enough data
8.1
8
Not enough data
8.1
8
Not enough data
7.7
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Automation
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Analysis
Not enough data
8.6
7
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
8.8
8
Not enough data
8.1
8
Issue Resolution
Not enough data
7.4
9
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Orchestration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Information
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Personalization
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
AWS Control Tower and Microsoft Defender for Cloud are categorized as Cloud Workload Protection Platforms and Cloud Compliance
Unique Categories
AWS Control Tower has no unique categories
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is categorized as Cloud Detection and Response (CDR), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM), Secure Code Review, Cloud Security Monitoring and Analytics, Software Composition Analysis, Container Security, Container Monitoring, and Threat Intelligence
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
AWS Control Tower
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Retail
11.1%
Information Technology and Services
11.1%
Information Services
11.1%
Hospital & Health Care
11.1%
Computer Software
11.1%
Other
44.4%
Information Technology and Services
23.4%
Computer Software
11.7%
Computer & Network Security
10.2%
Education Management
7.3%
Oil & Energy
3.6%
Other
43.8%
Most Helpful Reviews
AWS Control Tower
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Shubham J.
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
For any organization it is such a best features to give variable access to the multiple accounts and control all of them from single point of control tower. No messed up , no security breach just perfect for any organization security and role. To get...
Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Retail
It sometimes takes a while for it to load fully
Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Mohammad K.
Verified User in Accounting
It block the malicious activity on host and also block the suspicious activity done by user on host
Most Helpful Critical Review
Richard Owusu M.
Verified User in Commercial Real Estate
False positives: Like all security solutions, Microsoft Defender for Cloud may occasionally flag legitimate files or activities as threats. This can be frustrating for users who have to deal with the resulting alerts and disruptions. Limited...
Shubham J.
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
For any organization it is such a best features to give variable access to the multiple accounts and control all of them from single point of control tower. No messed up , no security breach just perfect for any organization security and role. To get...
Mohammad K.
Verified User in Accounting
It block the malicious activity on host and also block the suspicious activity done by user on host
Verified User in Retail
It sometimes takes a while for it to load fully
Richard Owusu M.
Verified User in Commercial Real Estate
False positives: Like all security solutions, Microsoft Defender for Cloud may occasionally flag legitimate files or activities as threats. This can be frustrating for users who have to deal with the resulting alerts and disruptions. Limited...
Alternatives
Discussions
How do I unsubscribe my AWS organization from CloudTrail?
1 comment
AH
how do I upgradeRead more
AWS Control Tower has no more discussions with answers
What are the three security services provided by Windows Azure?
2 comments
KS
It provides azure firewall, Microsoft sentinel, prevents DDOS Attack, defender for cloud Read more
Is Azure security Center a SIEM?
1 comment
AM
Azure Security Center (ASC) is a cloud-native security management platform that provides unified security management and threat protection across hybrid...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 2.5 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
or continue with
Gmail.com addresses not permitted. A business domain using Google is allowed.
By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
