Compare AWS CodeDeploy and Octopus Deploy 
- Users report that Octopus Deploy excels in Deployment Automation with a score of 9.6, highlighting its ability to streamline complex deployment processes effectively. Reviewers mention that the intuitive interface and robust automation features significantly reduce deployment times.
- Reviewers mention that AWS CodeDeploy offers superior Quality of Support with a score of 8.5, indicating that users appreciate the responsive customer service and extensive documentation available for troubleshooting and guidance.
- G2 users note that Octopus Deploy shines in Configuration Management with a score of 8.5, allowing for easy management of deployment configurations across multiple environments, which is particularly beneficial for enterprise-level applications.
- Users on G2 report that AWS CodeDeploy has a slight edge in Ease of Setup with a score of 7.9, with many reviewers appreciating the straightforward integration with other AWS services, making it easier for teams already using the AWS ecosystem.
- Reviewers mention that Octopus Deploy's Process Analytics feature, scoring 8.9, provides valuable insights into deployment processes, helping teams identify bottlenecks and optimize workflows, which is crucial for continuous improvement.
- Users say that AWS CodeDeploy's extensibility is a strong point, with a score of 7.7, as it allows for seamless integration with various CI/CD tools, enabling teams to customize their deployment pipelines according to their specific needs.
- No servers, no storage, no maintenance
- First-class support and customer service
- 24/7 monitoring and automatically backed up
I used AWS CodeDeploy to automate the deployment of our functions in a blue-green deployment manner to reduce the occurrence of errors in our application in a production system, also with the help of Lambda Versions.
This has poor integration and need to improve integrations with other services.
Octopus vastly simplifies the deployment of Windows-based services and websites. What used to be an hour long process of copying files around manually and editing config files is all automated into a process that takes a fraction of the time. The lifecycle...
My biggest complaint is that it must be manually installed on each deployment machine, there is no hosted service for this. Maintaining Octopus itself becomes a problem with time, with manual up-gradation required on each machine. There is also no facility...
I used AWS CodeDeploy to automate the deployment of our functions in a blue-green deployment manner to reduce the occurrence of errors in our application in a production system, also with the help of Lambda Versions.
Octopus vastly simplifies the deployment of Windows-based services and websites. What used to be an hour long process of copying files around manually and editing config files is all automated into a process that takes a fraction of the time. The lifecycle...
This has poor integration and need to improve integrations with other services.
My biggest complaint is that it must be manually installed on each deployment machine, there is no hosted service for this. Maintaining Octopus itself becomes a problem with time, with manual up-gradation required on each machine. There is also no facility...
