Compare AWS CodeCommit and GitLab 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (50.6% of reviews)
Small-Business (37.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
AWS CodeCommit
Star Rating
(85)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (50.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about AWS CodeCommitGitLab
Star Rating
(823)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about GitLabFeatured Products
Sponsored
OX Security
(48)
Bug Tracking
Visit Website
Sponsored
Axify
(4)
Bug Tracking
Visit Website
AWS CodeCommit vs GitLab
When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found GitLab easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with GitLab overall.
- Reviewers felt that GitLab meets the needs of their business better than AWS CodeCommit.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that AWS CodeCommit is the preferred option.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of AWS CodeCommit over GitLab.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
AWS CodeCommit
No pricing availableGitLab
No pricing availableFree Trial
AWS CodeCommit
No trial information availableGitLab
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
53
9.1
613
Ease of Use
8.6
53
8.7
615
Ease of Setup
8.3
18
8.5
175
Ease of Admin
8.2
17
8.6
160
Quality of Support
8.6
49
8.5
481
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.4
16
8.8
135
Product Direction (% positive)
9.6
53
8.7
581
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
8.7
117
Not enough data
8.9
125
Not enough data
8.6
117
Functionality
Not enough data
9.0
123
Not enough data
8.6
109
Not enough data
8.5
104
Not enough data
8.7
109
Not enough data
8.6
98
Processes
Not enough data
9.1
126
Not enough data
9.0
115
Not enough data
8.7
115
Administration
Not enough data
9.1
23
Not enough data
8.9
22
Analysis
Not enough data
8.5
21
Not enough data
8.8
22
Not enough data
8.9
22
Not enough data
8.7
21
Testing
Not enough data
8.6
22
Not enough data
8.6
22
Not enough data
8.9
21
Not enough data
8.7
21
Not enough data
8.6
19
Not enough data
8.2
19
Not enough data
8.5
19
Administration
Not enough data
9.0
21
Not enough data
8.7
21
Analysis
Not enough data
8.3
20
Not enough data
9.2
20
Not enough data
8.8
20
Not enough data
8.8
20
Not enough data
8.8
20
Testing
Not enough data
8.6
19
Not enough data
9.1
19
Not enough data
9.0
18
Not enough data
9.0
17
Not enough data
8.9
16
Not enough data
9.2
17
Administration
Not enough data
8.8
72
Not enough data
8.7
73
Not enough data
8.7
70
Not enough data
8.8
75
Automation
Not enough data
9.0
74
Not enough data
8.4
67
Not enough data
9.0
74
Not enough data
8.7
68
IT Management
Not enough data
8.7
69
Not enough data
8.8
69
Not enough data
8.6
66
Functionality
Not enough data
8.8
187
Not enough data
8.9
187
Not enough data
8.6
180
Management
Not enough data
8.7
174
Not enough data
8.3
167
Not enough data
8.9
180
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
8.6
121
Not enough data
8.5
115
Not enough data
8.5
123
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
8.4
120
Not enough data
8.8
128
Not enough data
8.8
120
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
8.8
60
Not enough data
8.7
65
Not enough data
8.7
62
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
8.8
59
Not enough data
8.9
59
Not enough data
8.9
56
Management
Not enough data
8.8
122
Not enough data
8.8
128
Not enough data
8.5
115
Functionality
Not enough data
8.8
127
Not enough data
8.8
127
Not enough data
8.7
119
Processes
Not enough data
9.0
131
Not enough data
8.5
120
Not enough data
8.9
134
Functionality
Not enough data
8.9
199
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
187
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
181
|
Verified
Management
Not enough data
8.9
189
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
193
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
174
|
Verified
Documentation
Not enough data
8.8
107
Not enough data
8.6
103
Not enough data
8.4
104
Security
Not enough data
8.0
92
Not enough data
8.4
92
Not enough data
8.9
101
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Value Analysis
Not enough data
8.9
37
Not enough data
8.7
39
Not enough data
8.6
35
Not enough data
8.8
35
Value Management
Not enough data
9.0
37
Not enough data
8.6
39
Not enough data
8.8
38
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
AWS CodeCommit and GitLab share no categories
Unique Categories
AWS CodeCommit is categorized as Version Control Software
GitLab is categorized as Secure Code Review, DevOps Platforms, Value Stream Management, Software Composition Analysis, Cloud Infrastructure Automation, Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Application Release Orchestration, Version Control Hosting, Peer Code Review, Continuous Delivery, Bug Tracking, Continuous Integration, and AI Code Generation
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
AWS CodeCommit
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
GitLab
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
35.1%
Information Technology and Services
14.3%
Financial Services
6.5%
Marketing and Advertising
5.2%
Telecommunications
3.9%
Other
35.1%
Computer Software
33.5%
Information Technology and Services
23.4%
Internet
4.1%
Financial Services
3.6%
Computer & Network Security
2.4%
Other
33.0%
Most Helpful Reviews
AWS CodeCommit
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
AWS CodeCommit is a GitHub alternative and is easy to setup and use
Most Helpful Critical Review
Vlad L.
Verified User in Financial Services
Behind GitHub' Need improve PR Nothing else to add
GitLab
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Daniel B.
Verified User in Public Policy
The built-in features of Auto DevOps have made our experience more rewarding and effective.
Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Marketing and Advertising
Very slow in general, a lot of failures and outages.
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
AWS CodeCommit is a GitHub alternative and is easy to setup and use
Daniel B.
Verified User in Public Policy
The built-in features of Auto DevOps have made our experience more rewarding and effective.
Vlad L.
Verified User in Financial Services
Behind GitHub' Need improve PR Nothing else to add
Verified User in Marketing and Advertising
Very slow in general, a lot of failures and outages.
Alternatives
Discussions
What is AWS CodeCommit used for?
1 comment
KC
AWS CodeCommit is a Git-like repository for storing and versioning your source code.Read more
AWS CodeCommit has no more discussions with answers
Is GitLab paid?
5 comments
PG
Yes, Gitlab is paid as it provides the flexibility to use all the features of the GitHub and Git as well as the freedom to use your own DataBase so that you...Read more
Is GitLab free software?
4 comments
RB
Yes, in that for non-commercial users, payment is unnecessary. Additionally, its source is publicly available.Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 2.5 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
or continue with
Gmail.com addresses not permitted. A business domain using Google is allowed.
By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
