Compare Autodesk InfraWorks 360 and MicroStation 
- Users report that MicroStation excels in "Drawing" with a score of 9.1, making it a preferred choice for detailed design work, while Autodesk InfraWorks 360 has a slightly lower score of 8.7 in the same category, indicating that it may not be as robust for intricate drawing tasks.
- Reviewers mention that MicroStation's "Dynamic Updating" feature, rated at 8.7, allows for real-time changes to designs, which is crucial for projects requiring constant revisions. In contrast, Autodesk InfraWorks 360, while still competent, has a lower score of 7.0 in "3D Rendering," suggesting it may not provide the same level of visual fidelity during updates.
- G2 users highlight that MicroStation's "Quality of Support" is rated at 7.6, which is higher than Autodesk InfraWorks 360's 6.8, indicating that users may find more reliable assistance when using MicroStation for their projects.
- Users on G2 report that MicroStation's "File Import/Export" capabilities score 8.4, making it easier to integrate with other software, while Autodesk InfraWorks 360's score of 7.8 suggests it may face challenges in this area, potentially complicating workflows.
- Reviewers say that MicroStation shines in "Editing" with a score of 8.9, which is significantly higher than Autodesk InfraWorks 360's score of 6.7, indicating that users may find MicroStation more intuitive and efficient for making design adjustments.
- Users report that Autodesk InfraWorks 360 has a strong performance in "Transportation engineering," scoring 9.0, which may appeal to users focused on infrastructure projects, while MicroStation's score of 7.5 in "Structural engineering" suggests it may not be as specialized in this area.
- Training via Virtuosity Keys
- Flexible for your project needs
- Named-User license
Overall I like the ease of use. I started this software from basically nothing, and learned as I went. I have no formal AutoCAD or 3D training. (I am a GIS Professional). I have been using InfraWorks since its infancy. I was given a license and told to...
The graphics interface is a bit 'gamy' and integration with serious CAD software like Civil3D does need a bit of work. Quite often I did experience some graphical problems whilst assigning coordinate systems to sites overseas. If one could have a single...
I think MicroStation is the best software for Civil and Rail technicians, designers and engineers in the world. You do not need any special course to start. I think with help from more experienced users is fully-sufficient. In each company where I worked...
The user interface definitely needs to be adjusted. Don't get me wrong, the old Microstation was much worse but some more tweeks need to be made. They need to update more often too, not like the AutoCAD every year update but the time span between updates...
Overall I like the ease of use. I started this software from basically nothing, and learned as I went. I have no formal AutoCAD or 3D training. (I am a GIS Professional). I have been using InfraWorks since its infancy. I was given a license and told to...
I think MicroStation is the best software for Civil and Rail technicians, designers and engineers in the world. You do not need any special course to start. I think with help from more experienced users is fully-sufficient. In each company where I worked...
The graphics interface is a bit 'gamy' and integration with serious CAD software like Civil3D does need a bit of work. Quite often I did experience some graphical problems whilst assigning coordinate systems to sites overseas. If one could have a single...
The user interface definitely needs to be adjusted. Don't get me wrong, the old Microstation was much worse but some more tweeks need to be made. They need to update more often too, not like the AutoCAD every year update but the time span between updates...
