- Home
- ...
- PCB Design Software
- Autodesk EAGLE
- SolidWorks Electrical Schematics
- Autodesk EAGLE-vs-SolidWorks Electrical Schematics
Compare Autodesk EAGLE and SolidWorks Electrical Schematics 
- Reviews say that Autodesk EAGLE excels in PCB layout editing with a score of 8.5, making it a preferred choice for users focused on detailed circuit board designs. In contrast, SolidWorks Electrical Schematics, while strong in schematic editing with a score of 8.6, does not match EAGLE's capabilities in PCB layout.
- Users report that SolidWorks Electrical Schematics offers superior quality of support, scoring 8.6 compared to Autodesk EAGLE's 7.8. This difference is significant for teams that prioritize responsive customer service and technical assistance.
- G2 users mention that Autodesk EAGLE's component libraries score 7.5, which some users find limiting compared to SolidWorks Electrical Schematics, which provides a more extensive library, enhancing the design process for complex projects.
- Users on G2 highlight that SolidWorks Electrical Schematics shines in ease of use with a score of 8.3, while Autodesk EAGLE's score of 7.6 indicates a steeper learning curve, particularly for new users.
- Reviewers mention that Autodesk EAGLE's customization options, such as custom commands, score 8.3, allowing for tailored workflows, whereas SolidWorks Electrical Schematics has a lower score of 7.7 in custom interface, indicating less flexibility in user interface adjustments.
- Users say that while both products have strong design capabilities, Autodesk EAGLE's board size and layers scores of 8.4 suggest it is better suited for users needing detailed control over board specifications, which is crucial for advanced PCB design projects.
- Bring your designs to life by adding electronic intelligence using the Schematic design, PCB Layout and routing capabilities integrated in Fusion 360
Easy to use. Free to prototype and learn. Max components libraries are available. Famous vendors provide compatible relevant eagle libraries of their components.
Default configuration is not very good, but can be improved with some effort. Default libraries are mostly useless. The package wizard is okay, but not every package type is available. 3d packages are only available through the web-based tool. Poor graphics...
For SOLIDWORKS Electrical Schematics I liked that one could easily tell how a schematic was mocked up and how easy it is to read when they come through.
what we didn't really like was the download part and activation feature. it was really hard to replace the old version with this new one
Easy to use. Free to prototype and learn. Max components libraries are available. Famous vendors provide compatible relevant eagle libraries of their components.
For SOLIDWORKS Electrical Schematics I liked that one could easily tell how a schematic was mocked up and how easy it is to read when they come through.
Default configuration is not very good, but can be improved with some effort. Default libraries are mostly useless. The package wizard is okay, but not every package type is available. 3d packages are only available through the web-based tool. Poor graphics...
what we didn't really like was the download part and activation feature. it was really hard to replace the old version with this new one
