When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found SolidWorks Composer easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with SolidWorks Composer overall.
About Autodesk 360, I mostly admire the easiest way to share the project. In this, I use the linking command for structure and architecture projects. And also the software where all the engineers can upload their respective projects.
Less user friendly as it claims; could be as user friendly as other Autodesk softwares
Very easy to use after AutoCAD. Lines, Constraints and oher parameters are easily identifiable. All command/tool symbols representation is very good and looks awesome. Simulation part is also fantastic
This is really only for creating cameras and your camera paths/ flybys and very limited in what you can do with your models and lacking any visual effects. We are currently using adobe premier after to add in our effects which is somewhat time consuming and...
About Autodesk 360, I mostly admire the easiest way to share the project. In this, I use the linking command for structure and architecture projects. And also the software where all the engineers can upload their respective projects.
Very easy to use after AutoCAD. Lines, Constraints and oher parameters are easily identifiable. All command/tool symbols representation is very good and looks awesome. Simulation part is also fantastic
Less user friendly as it claims; could be as user friendly as other Autodesk softwares
This is really only for creating cameras and your camera paths/ flybys and very limited in what you can do with your models and lacking any visual effects. We are currently using adobe premier after to add in our effects which is somewhat time consuming and...