Compare AutoCAD and Civil 3D 
- Users report that AutoCAD excels in "Drawing" and "Editing" capabilities, both scoring a perfect 9.2, making it a preferred choice for detailed design work. In contrast, Civil 3D also performs well in these areas but does not surpass AutoCAD's ratings.
- Reviewers mention that Civil 3D shines in "Grading" and "Earthwork" functionalities, with scores of 8.9 and 9.1 respectively, which are crucial for civil engineering projects. AutoCAD, while strong, does not offer the same level of specialized tools for these tasks.
- G2 users highlight that AutoCAD's "Ease of Use" is rated at 8.3, making it more user-friendly for beginners compared to Civil 3D's lower score of 7.4. This suggests that AutoCAD may be a better option for those new to design software.
- Users on G2 report that Civil 3D's "Dynamic Updating" feature, rated at 8.8, allows for real-time changes in design, which is particularly beneficial for collaborative projects. AutoCAD's score of 8.4 in this area indicates it is slightly less efficient in this regard.
- Reviewers mention that AutoCAD's "Quality of Support" is rated at 8.2, which is higher than Civil 3D's 7.4. This could be a deciding factor for users who prioritize customer service and support when choosing software.
- Users say that Civil 3D's "File Import/Export" capabilities are rated at 9.1, outperforming AutoCAD's 8.8, making it a better choice for projects that require extensive data sharing and collaboration across different platforms.
- Access to the latest software releases
- 1-on-1 online support
- Includes AutoCAD Mobile App
- Access to the latest version
- Use software anywhere
- Access previous versions
I have been using AutoCAD for more than 15 years and find it an excellent tool for creating construction documentation that could be used by all disciplines in the Architectural, Engineering and Construction (AEC) industry. The program is very versatile and...
There is a lot of clunkiness involved in drawing using "smart" objects that have attributes. Putting together schedule tables or other such takeoffs can be quite difficult and require a large amount of training. The BIM features of this software are a huge...
The program is very intuitive meaning buttons and ocmmands make sense. There are usually multiple ways to do a task and when I can't figure out something, usually a quick search online will net an an easy to apply answer. The problem is generally a lack...
Not enough characters, not much I like about the software. The surfaces are cumbersome and are difficult to use, especially when doing earthwork. No tool to use dview twist easier. No reason to use UCS if in Civil/Survey business except for very special...
I have been using AutoCAD for more than 15 years and find it an excellent tool for creating construction documentation that could be used by all disciplines in the Architectural, Engineering and Construction (AEC) industry. The program is very versatile and...
The program is very intuitive meaning buttons and ocmmands make sense. There are usually multiple ways to do a task and when I can't figure out something, usually a quick search online will net an an easy to apply answer. The problem is generally a lack...
There is a lot of clunkiness involved in drawing using "smart" objects that have attributes. Putting together schedule tables or other such takeoffs can be quite difficult and require a large amount of training. The BIM features of this software are a huge...
Not enough characters, not much I like about the software. The surfaces are cumbersome and are difficult to use, especially when doing earthwork. No tool to use dview twist easier. No reason to use UCS if in Civil/Survey business except for very special...
