Compare Artisteer and CoffeeCup HTML Editor 
- Users report that CoffeeCup HTML Editor excels in its "HTML and CSS Editors" feature, providing a robust environment for coding with real-time previews, while Artisteer is noted for its "WYSIWYG Editor Integration," which allows users to design visually without needing extensive coding knowledge.
- Reviewers mention that CoffeeCup's "Templates Library" is extensive, offering a variety of customizable templates that cater to small businesses, whereas Artisteer is praised for its "Drag and Drop" functionality, making it easier for users to create layouts without technical skills.
- G2 users highlight that CoffeeCup HTML Editor has a strong "Ease of Setup" rating, making it quick to get started, while Artisteer users appreciate its "Content Management" capabilities, which streamline the process of managing website content.
- Users on G2 report that CoffeeCup's "Quality of Support" is satisfactory, but Artisteer users mention that they have experienced more responsive customer service, particularly when dealing with technical issues.
- Reviewers say that CoffeeCup HTML Editor has a lower "Product Direction" score, indicating some concerns about future updates and features, while Artisteer has a more positive outlook, with users feeling confident about ongoing improvements and new functionalities.
- Users report that while both products cater well to small businesses, Artisteer shines in its "Marketing Tools Integrations," allowing for seamless connections with various marketing platforms, which is a crucial feature for users looking to enhance their online presence.
It's easy to use, graphic but under the hood there are lots of possibilities. You don't really need them all the time but they are there when you do and you can get along just fine without em.
I have the trial version so I was not able to save my website to my database.They could give just a one rime deal on the first website.
I like the whole format, from the conception of its basic coding, the realistic evaluation of the excellent operability of the software, to the fine resulting HTML code for the web application for additions, the manufacturing of web pages, and the changes...
Could use some more updated tools such as integration with wordpress
It's easy to use, graphic but under the hood there are lots of possibilities. You don't really need them all the time but they are there when you do and you can get along just fine without em.
I like the whole format, from the conception of its basic coding, the realistic evaluation of the excellent operability of the software, to the fine resulting HTML code for the web application for additions, the manufacturing of web pages, and the changes...
I have the trial version so I was not able to save my website to my database.They could give just a one rime deal on the first website.
Could use some more updated tools such as integration with wordpress
