Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Appknox and SonarQube 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Endor Labs
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aikido Security
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Cyclopt Companion
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (41.0% of reviews)
Enterprise (41.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$$$ Per App/year
Free
Appknox
Star Rating
(43)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (41.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
$$$ Per App/year
Browse all 3 pricing plansSonarQube
Star Rating
(125)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (41.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 5 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that SonarQube Server excels in Static Code Analysis with a score of 9.0, providing comprehensive insights into code quality. In contrast, Appknox also performs well in this area with a score of 9.2, but users mention that its focus is more on security vulnerabilities rather than overall code quality.
- Reviewers mention that Appknox shines in Compliance Testing, scoring 9.1, which is significantly higher than SonarQube's score of 7.1. Users appreciate Appknox's ability to streamline compliance processes, making it a preferred choice for organizations prioritizing regulatory adherence.
- G2 users highlight that SonarQube Server's API / Integrations score of 9.0 is a strong point, allowing for seamless integration with various development tools. However, Appknox outperforms in this area with a score of 9.5, indicating a more extensive range of integrations that enhance its usability in diverse environments.
- Users on G2 report that Appknox's Manual Testing capabilities are superior, with a score of 9.3 compared to SonarQube's 6.3. Reviewers mention that Appknox provides a more thorough manual testing experience, which is crucial for identifying nuanced security issues.
- Reviewers say that SonarQube Server's Ease of Use is rated at 8.3, which is lower than Appknox's 9.2. Users appreciate Appknox's user-friendly interface and intuitive navigation, making it easier for teams to adopt and utilize effectively.
- Users report that while SonarQube Server has a solid Quality of Support score of 8.0, Appknox stands out with a score of 9.2. Reviewers mention that Appknox's support team is responsive and knowledgeable, providing timely assistance that enhances the overall user experience.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Appknox
Appknox Essential
$$$
Per App/year
Appknox Essential plan enables the user to upload a single app for a one-time assessment or VAPT of Mobile Application.
- SAST (Static Application Security Testing).
- DAST (Dynamic Application Security Testing).
- APIT (Dynamic Induced API Security Testing).
SonarQube
Community Edition
Free
Explore: https://www.sonarsource.com/plans-and-pricing/
- Free
- Popular & classic languages support
- Integration with DevOps platforms
Free Trial
Appknox
Free Trial is available
SonarQube
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
30
8.8
108
Ease of Use
9.2
30
8.5
111
Ease of Setup
8.8
14
8.1
70
Ease of Admin
9.2
15
8.5
63
Quality of Support
9.2
30
8.2
91
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.8
15
8.4
57
Product Direction (% positive)
9.2
28
8.6
105
Features by Category
Administration
9.0
7
Not enough data
9.3
7
Not enough data
8.8
8
Not enough data
Analysis
9.8
7
Not enough data
9.4
9
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
Testing
8.3
6
Not enough data
9.1
9
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
9.1
9
Not enough data
Administration
9.5
11
7.8
19
9.2
11
6.0
20
Analysis
9.3
14
7.4
21
9.1
11
8.0
20
9.2
14
8.9
22
9.1
11
9.0
22
Testing
9.0
8
6.6
18
9.3
12
5.9
19
8.6
12
6.0
21
9.1
13
6.9
18
9.2
10
6.8
17
8.8
13
8.2
21
8.9
14
6.9
21
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
9.0
15
Not enough data
8.9
15
Not enough data
Analysis
9.1
16
Not enough data
8.9
15
Not enough data
9.4
17
Not enough data
9.1
17
Not enough data
9.0
14
Not enough data
Testing
8.9
15
Not enough data
8.9
14
Not enough data
9.1
13
Not enough data
8.6
12
Not enough data
9.0
14
Not enough data
7.7
16
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.1
31
Not enough data
8.4
30
Not enough data
8.2
29
Management
Not enough data
7.7
27
Not enough data
7.5
25
Not enough data
7.8
27
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
7.7
10
Not enough data
8.0
10
Not enough data
8.3
10
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
7.8
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
8.5
10
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Documentation
Not enough data
7.7
35
Not enough data
7.6
35
Not enough data
8.2
36
Security
Not enough data
6.9
33
Not enough data
7.0
32
Not enough data
7.9
33
Risk management - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
8.9
6
Integration and efficiency - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Reporting and Analytics - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.3
5
Agentic AI - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Compliance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Risk Management & Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Lifecycle Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Access Control and Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Collaboration and Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AI Governance Tools
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
6.3
8
Not enough data
5.7
7
Not enough data
6.7
8
Performance - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Appknox and SonarQube are categorized as Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Unique Categories
Appknox is categorized as Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) and Penetration Testing
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Appknox
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SonarQube
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
25.6%
Financial Services
15.4%
Computer Software
12.8%
Internet
5.1%
Food & Beverages
5.1%
Other
35.9%
Information Technology and Services
26.6%
Computer Software
21.8%
Financial Services
6.5%
Hospital & Health Care
3.2%
Computer & Network Security
3.2%
Other
38.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
Appknox has no discussions with answers
SonarQube has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
