Compare Flow and LinearB 
- Users report that Pluralsight Flow excels in its Repository Integration with a score of 8.8, allowing seamless connections with various version control systems, while LinearB, with a score of 9.0, offers even more robust integrations that enhance workflow efficiency.
- Reviewers mention that LinearB shines in Quality of Support, scoring an impressive 9.5, which users attribute to responsive customer service and extensive documentation, whereas Pluralsight Flow, with a score of 8.0, has received mixed feedback on support timeliness.
- G2 users highlight that LinearB's Analytics and Trends feature, rated at 9.0, provides deeper insights into team performance and project timelines, while Pluralsight Flow, scoring 8.5, offers useful analytics but lacks some advanced trend analysis capabilities.
- Users on G2 report that Pluralsight Flow's Planning Tools are less effective, scoring only 6.5, which can hinder project management, while LinearB's tools, rated at 8.1, are praised for their intuitive design and effectiveness in resource allocation.
- Reviewers mention that both products have their strengths in Impact Predictions, but LinearB's score of 8.6 indicates a more reliable forecasting ability compared to Pluralsight Flow's 7.6, which some users find lacking in accuracy.
- Users say that while both platforms offer Productivity Updates, LinearB's score of 8.5 reflects a more user-friendly approach to tracking progress, whereas Pluralsight Flow's score of 8.2 suggests room for improvement in how updates are communicated to users.
- All fundamental metrics
- Retrospective
- Proficiency
- No credit card required
- 5-minute self-onboard
- Upgrade any time
When working properly, the product can provide valuable insight into finding talent within your organization. It can also help find developers that struggle and improve their coding and code review practices. The product is in constant evolution.
The idea of Flow is good, but the current implementation is limited to when a PR was done, but it doesn't have what I need: How is the employee performing this sprint when compared with other sprints? Are the employees working in the same area of code...
The product: - The fact that it analyses our main bus - git, and also integrates with our issue tracking platform. - The custom granularity - we can analyze performance starting from a single contributor, through a team and all the way to the whole...
The data accuracy of the platform is embarrassing. Don't trust the metrics provided. For what is supposed to be a core competency data was regularly missing, incorrect or duplicated. Basic calculations were inaccurate. Support tried hard but was incapable...
When working properly, the product can provide valuable insight into finding talent within your organization. It can also help find developers that struggle and improve their coding and code review practices. The product is in constant evolution.
The product: - The fact that it analyses our main bus - git, and also integrates with our issue tracking platform. - The custom granularity - we can analyze performance starting from a single contributor, through a team and all the way to the whole...
The idea of Flow is good, but the current implementation is limited to when a PR was done, but it doesn't have what I need: How is the employee performing this sprint when compared with other sprints? Are the employees working in the same area of code...
The data accuracy of the platform is embarrassing. Don't trust the metrics provided. For what is supposed to be a core competency data was regularly missing, incorrect or duplicated. Basic calculations were inaccurate. Support tried hard but was incapable...
