Compare Flow and Jellyfish 
- Users report that Pluralsight Flow excels in its Repository Integration with a score of 8.8, allowing seamless connections with various code repositories, while Jellyfish, with a score of 8.5, offers solid integration but lacks some of the depth that Flow provides.
- Reviewers mention that Jellyfish shines in Quality of Support, scoring 9.2 compared to Pluralsight Flow's 8.0. Many users appreciate Jellyfish's responsive customer service and extensive documentation, which they find helpful for troubleshooting.
- G2 users highlight that Pluralsight Flow's Productivity Updates feature, scoring 8.2, is particularly useful for tracking team performance over time, whereas Jellyfish, with a score of 8.5, offers more advanced analytics that some users find more insightful for long-term planning.
- Users on G2 report that Jellyfish's Planning Tools score of 8.2 significantly outperforms Pluralsight Flow's 6.5, with many reviewers noting that Jellyfish provides better frameworks for project management and resource allocation.
- Reviewers mention that both products perform well in Impact Predictions, but Jellyfish's score of 8.5 is favored over Pluralsight Flow's 7.6, as users find Jellyfish's predictive analytics more accurate and actionable for future project planning.
- Users say that while both platforms offer Report Generation capabilities, Jellyfish's 8.2 score is preferred over Pluralsight Flow's 7.9, with many users appreciating Jellyfish's customizable reporting features that allow for tailored insights into team performance.
- All fundamental metrics
- Retrospective
- Proficiency
When working properly, the product can provide valuable insight into finding talent within your organization. It can also help find developers that struggle and improve their coding and code review practices. The product is in constant evolution.
The idea of Flow is good, but the current implementation is limited to when a PR was done, but it doesn't have what I need: How is the employee performing this sprint when compared with other sprints? Are the employees working in the same area of code...
Jellyfish gives me immediate insight into how my team is doing, with line-level detail at a click of a button. It's also interesting to see the benchmarked data of any group against any group; team against company, company against external companies, team...
Jellyfish UI is a little old; it can be made engaging. Jellyfish JIRA integration should be improved. Jellyfish should give an alert if the candidates performance is going down.
When working properly, the product can provide valuable insight into finding talent within your organization. It can also help find developers that struggle and improve their coding and code review practices. The product is in constant evolution.
Jellyfish gives me immediate insight into how my team is doing, with line-level detail at a click of a button. It's also interesting to see the benchmarked data of any group against any group; team against company, company against external companies, team...
The idea of Flow is good, but the current implementation is limited to when a PR was done, but it doesn't have what I need: How is the employee performing this sprint when compared with other sprints? Are the employees working in the same area of code...
Jellyfish UI is a little old; it can be made engaging. Jellyfish JIRA integration should be improved. Jellyfish should give an alert if the candidates performance is going down.
