Compare Apigee Edge and Kong API Gateway 
- Users report that Apigee Edge excels in API Testing with a score of 9.4, while Kong API Gateway lags behind at 8.4. Reviewers mention that Apigee's robust testing features allow for comprehensive validation of APIs before deployment, which is crucial for enterprise-level applications.
- Reviewers mention that Apigee Edge offers superior Data Security with a score of 9.0 compared to Kong's 8.7. Users on G2 highlight Apigee's advanced security protocols and compliance features, making it a preferred choice for organizations handling sensitive data.
- Users say that Apigee Edge shines in API Monitoring with a score of 9.0, while Kong API Gateway scores 8.3. Reviewers mention that Apigee's monitoring tools provide real-time insights and analytics, which are essential for maintaining optimal API performance.
- G2 users report that Apigee Edge has a more comprehensive Traffic Control feature, scoring 9.2 against Kong's 8.8. Users highlight that Apigee's traffic management capabilities allow for better load balancing and performance optimization during peak usage times.
- Reviewers mention that Kong API Gateway has a more flexible Plugins system, scoring 8.7 compared to Apigee's 7.6. Users appreciate Kong's extensive library of plugins that allow for easy customization and integration with various services.
- Users on G2 report that Apigee Edge provides a better overall user experience with an Ease of Use score of 9.3, while Kong API Gateway scores 8.6. Reviewers mention that Apigee's intuitive interface and comprehensive documentation make it easier for teams to adopt and utilize effectively.
- The easiest way to get started with Kong Gateway
- Customizable Dev Portal
- Plugins to extend capabilities including authentication, authorization, rate-limiting, transformations, security, and more
From the security point of view, this tool allows us to secure the APIs via TLS and also OAuth. It is very effective in handling Requests and Responses - Users can easily modify responses and adjust them as per needs of the cases without changing any...
It is very awkward to manage your proxies in code. Each endpoint requires essentially its own git repository, which is not ideal. Logging and reporting could be better as well.
Kong is wonderful if you enjoy Lua with Openresty and look to have an sll-in-one solution for API implementation and management. Lua is not as popular as it should be, but Openresty has proven performance and a strong community. For developers using either...
here comes the thing which are not talk about much about kong- 1. kong is yet to understand the requirements of the clients let alone the thought of implementing it, because it takes too much time (months)to solve a simple bug . 2. Delay in deliviring...
From the security point of view, this tool allows us to secure the APIs via TLS and also OAuth. It is very effective in handling Requests and Responses - Users can easily modify responses and adjust them as per needs of the cases without changing any...
Kong is wonderful if you enjoy Lua with Openresty and look to have an sll-in-one solution for API implementation and management. Lua is not as popular as it should be, but Openresty has proven performance and a strong community. For developers using either...
It is very awkward to manage your proxies in code. Each endpoint requires essentially its own git repository, which is not ideal. Logging and reporting could be better as well.
here comes the thing which are not talk about much about kong- 1. kong is yet to understand the requirements of the clients let alone the thought of implementing it, because it takes too much time (months)to solve a simple bug . 2. Delay in deliviring...
