Compare Apache Karaf and IBM Storage Ceph 
- Users report that IBM Storage Ceph excels in scalability, allowing organizations to easily expand their storage capacity as needed, while Apache Karaf is noted for its flexibility in deploying applications, making it a preferred choice for developers looking for a lightweight container.
- Reviewers mention that the ease of setup for Apache Karaf is significantly higher, with a score of 8.9 compared to IBM Storage Ceph's 6.8, indicating that users find Karaf more straightforward to implement in their environments.
- G2 users highlight that IBM Storage Ceph's quality of support is rated at 8.2, which is higher than Apache Karaf's 7.4, suggesting that users feel more supported when using Ceph for their storage needs.
- Users on G2 report that while both products have a star rating of 4.2, IBM Storage Ceph is particularly favored in the mid-market segment, with 35% of reviews coming from this demographic, indicating a strong alignment with mid-sized business needs.
- Reviewers say that Apache Karaf shines in its ease of administration, scoring 8.6, which is higher than IBM Storage Ceph's 7.3, suggesting that users find Karaf easier to manage over time.
- Users say that IBM Storage Ceph has a perfect product direction score of 10.0, indicating strong confidence in its future development, while Apache Karaf's score of 7.3 suggests some uncertainty among users regarding its ongoing enhancements.
Quick setup and running - in a SpringBoot application just add annotation @KafkaListener to your Consumer and you are good to go. Also you can explore more complex setups while using a running application. Also horizontal scalability is a big like.
It felt quite complicated . The solutioning had quite long process of sending a request from database to the outbound application
Availability, performance, ability to run on commodity hardware
What I dislike is not specific to Ceph but specific to all on prem management. I believe the future in technology is going to be in the cloud. And management of even a mature technology like Ceph is not as attractive as adopting a fully managed storage...
Quick setup and running - in a SpringBoot application just add annotation @KafkaListener to your Consumer and you are good to go. Also you can explore more complex setups while using a running application. Also horizontal scalability is a big like.
Availability, performance, ability to run on commodity hardware
It felt quite complicated . The solutioning had quite long process of sending a request from database to the outbound application
What I dislike is not specific to Ceph but specific to all on prem management. I believe the future in technology is going to be in the cloud. And management of even a mature technology like Ceph is not as attractive as adopting a fully managed storage...
