Compare Apache Jena and spring.io 
- Users report that spring.io excels in application deployment with a score of 9.3, highlighting its seamless integration capabilities and robust deployment tools, while Apache Jena, lacking in this area, has not received a specific score for application deployment.
- Reviewers mention that spring.io offers a superior development environment with a score of 9.0, which is praised for its comprehensive support for various programming languages and frameworks, whereas Apache Jena's development tools are less versatile, leading to a lower user satisfaction.
- G2 users indicate that spring.io shines in database management with a score of 9.3, with features like automatic scaling and efficient backup/recovery processes, while Apache Jena, with a lower focus on these features, has received mixed reviews regarding its database capabilities.
- Users on G2 highlight that spring.io's quality of support is rated at 8.4, with many reviewers appreciating the responsive customer service and extensive documentation, contrasting with Apache Jena's slightly lower support rating of 8.1, where users have noted slower response times.
- Reviewers say that spring.io's product direction is highly rated at 9.1, indicating a strong commitment to innovation and user feedback, while Apache Jena's product direction score of 6.5 suggests a need for improvement in aligning with user needs and expectations.
- Users report that spring.io's ease of use is rated at 8.5, with many finding the interface intuitive and user-friendly, while Apache Jena's ease of use score of 7.3 reflects challenges some users face in navigating its more complex features.
I like the fact its an open source semantic web framework for java.
Because it is java and not everyone uses java in my line of work we dont see much use for Apache Jena other than the few applications we have in the lab.
It really helps me focus on my business features instead of worrying about configuration, boilerplate code and thinks like those. It can be integrated with almost any technology I usually use: relational database, mongoDB, redis, JMS, etc... Moreover...
At this point, it's not really relevant. The practices, RAD nature and speed ups for Spring have been incorporated in Spring Boot and JHipster. You can now do similar RAD development with other Spring tools. ROO also has that proprietary wirings that...
I like the fact its an open source semantic web framework for java.
It really helps me focus on my business features instead of worrying about configuration, boilerplate code and thinks like those. It can be integrated with almost any technology I usually use: relational database, mongoDB, redis, JMS, etc... Moreover...
Because it is java and not everyone uses java in my line of work we dont see much use for Apache Jena other than the few applications we have in the lab.
At this point, it's not really relevant. The practices, RAD nature and speed ups for Spring have been incorporated in Spring Boot and JHipster. You can now do similar RAD development with other Spring tools. ROO also has that proprietary wirings that...
