Compare Apache Felix and spring.io 
- Users report that spring.io excels in application deployment with a score of 9.3, highlighting its seamless integration with cloud services and robust deployment pipelines, while Apache Felix, although effective, does not match this level of ease and efficiency.
- Reviewers mention that spring.io offers superior development tools, scoring 9.0, which include comprehensive support for microservices architecture, whereas Apache Felix, with a lower score, is noted for its flexibility but lacks some of the advanced features that developers seek.
- G2 users indicate that spring.io's testing capabilities are highly rated at 9.3, with features like Spring Test that simplify unit and integration testing, while users on G2 find Apache Felix's testing support to be less comprehensive, leading to more manual testing efforts.
- Users say that spring.io shines in database management with a score of 9.3, particularly due to its integration with various databases and support for reactive programming, while Apache Felix, although functional, does not provide the same level of database versatility.
- Reviewers mention that spring.io's security features, rated at 8.7, are robust, with built-in security configurations and OAuth support, whereas Apache Felix's security measures are considered adequate but not as extensive, leading to concerns among some users about potential vulnerabilities.
- Users report that spring.io's ease of use is rated at 8.5, with many praising its clear documentation and community support, while Apache Felix, with a lower score of 7.7, is noted for having a steeper learning curve, which can be a barrier for new users.
I like Apache Felix because it is a continuously evolving open source framework that improves server operations. DX is one of the features I like the most.
Its ecosystem is smaller compared to platforms, its uselessness and noninformative nature does not compensate for that. Theres room for improvement and upgrades in tools and open source platforms. Apache Felix is being complicated.
It really helps me focus on my business features instead of worrying about configuration, boilerplate code and thinks like those. It can be integrated with almost any technology I usually use: relational database, mongoDB, redis, JMS, etc... Moreover...
It seems that jHipster is WAAAAY more powerful with more combinations and frameworks than Spring Roo. Frontend is old way of doing web. Spring Roo is still using MVC pattern. While in jHipster you can use Angular, React,Vue. You can setup as...
I like Apache Felix because it is a continuously evolving open source framework that improves server operations. DX is one of the features I like the most.
It really helps me focus on my business features instead of worrying about configuration, boilerplate code and thinks like those. It can be integrated with almost any technology I usually use: relational database, mongoDB, redis, JMS, etc... Moreover...
Its ecosystem is smaller compared to platforms, its uselessness and noninformative nature does not compensate for that. Theres room for improvement and upgrades in tools and open source platforms. Apache Felix is being complicated.
It seems that jHipster is WAAAAY more powerful with more combinations and frameworks than Spring Roo. Frontend is old way of doing web. Spring Roo is still using MVC pattern. While in jHipster you can use Angular, React,Vue. You can setup as...
