Compare Android and BlackBerry QNX 
- Users report that Android excels in ease of use with a score of 9.2, while BlackBerry QNX lags behind at 8.2, making Android a more user-friendly option for everyday tasks.
- Reviewers mention that Android's memory management is superior, allowing for better RAM management, which is crucial for multitasking and running multiple applications smoothly.
- G2 users highlight that Android's quality of support is rated at 8.5, compared to BlackBerry QNX's 8.1, indicating that users may find more reliable assistance when issues arise with Android.
- Users on G2 report that Android has a higher product direction score of 9.2, suggesting that it is more aligned with user needs and future developments compared to BlackBerry QNX's 7.3.
- Reviewers say that Android's backup and recovery features are more robust, providing users with better data backup options, which is essential for maintaining data integrity.
- Users mention that BlackBerry QNX's system operations monitoring is effective, but Android's overall performance in I/O management is often seen as more efficient, leading to a smoother user experience.
Android iterates so fast, and there is always a better update shortly down the road. And it is very friendly to the user. The Google search integration, and Google product integration, into phones with the OS, is easily the best part.
It's slow sometimes: opening apps, changing pages on the home screen, editing settings, etc.
By having some experience in Eclipse and Linux, you will be able to set up an embedded development platform in your machine quite easily.
Support. And in nature it is extremely difficult to build a complex system that has many components. This is because the bare micro-kernel only provides an ability of scheduling the components, however, if one wants those components systematically working...
Android iterates so fast, and there is always a better update shortly down the road. And it is very friendly to the user. The Google search integration, and Google product integration, into phones with the OS, is easily the best part.
By having some experience in Eclipse and Linux, you will be able to set up an embedded development platform in your machine quite easily.
It's slow sometimes: opening apps, changing pages on the home screen, editing settings, etc.
Support. And in nature it is extremely difficult to build a complex system that has many components. This is because the bare micro-kernel only provides an ability of scheduling the components, however, if one wants those components systematically working...
