Compare Android NDK and iOS SDK 
- Users report that the iOS SDK excels in "Ease of Use" with a score of 8.3, while the Android NDK falls behind at 6.8, making iOS SDK a more user-friendly option for developers.
- Reviewers mention that the iOS SDK offers superior "Straight-Out-the-Box Functionality" with a score of 9.3, indicating that it provides a more seamless experience for developers right from the start compared to the Android NDK.
- G2 users highlight that the iOS SDK has a higher "Ease of Setup" rating at 8.3, whereas the Android NDK's score of 7.2 suggests a more complex setup process, which could be a deterrent for new developers.
- Users on G2 report that the iOS SDK has a better "Quality of Support" rating at 7.9, compared to the Android NDK's 7.8, indicating that developers may find more reliable assistance when using iOS SDK.
- Reviewers mention that the iOS SDK has a higher "Product Direction" score of 9.6, suggesting a more positive outlook on future updates and features, while the Android NDK scores a perfect 10.0, indicating strong confidence in its ongoing development.
- Users say that the iOS SDK is particularly praised for its "Help Guides," which are noted to be comprehensive and user-friendly, while the Android NDK's documentation is often described as less intuitive, leading to potential challenges for developers seeking assistance.
I like that android apps can be written natively in C/C++ and not Java, this allows apps to get fine grain access to the system and can also gain a lot of performance. In addition, it is much harder to reverse engineer an app using NDK than the java or...
There are difficulties in the automatic execution of tests, a problem caused by Android as a platform. Documentation not always up to date. Often on the latest versions the external libraries do not work well
The iOS SDK provides all available features and accesses to the iPhone and iPad devices. In my opinion, together with Xcode this is an unbeatable combination to create native apps.
_ The lack of editing features (ex: refactoring, usage search, etc.) XCode provides compared to other IDES (ex: Appcode or Android Studio). _ The painful and complicated code signing system. _ The painful and complicated crash symbolicating system. _...
I like that android apps can be written natively in C/C++ and not Java, this allows apps to get fine grain access to the system and can also gain a lot of performance. In addition, it is much harder to reverse engineer an app using NDK than the java or...
The iOS SDK provides all available features and accesses to the iPhone and iPad devices. In my opinion, together with Xcode this is an unbeatable combination to create native apps.
There are difficulties in the automatic execution of tests, a problem caused by Android as a platform. Documentation not always up to date. Often on the latest versions the external libraries do not work well
_ The lack of editing features (ex: refactoring, usage search, etc.) XCode provides compared to other IDES (ex: Appcode or Android Studio). _ The painful and complicated code signing system. _ The painful and complicated crash symbolicating system. _...
