Compare Altium Designer and CAM350 
- Users report that Altium Designer excels in PCB layout editing with a score of 9.2, while CAM350 falls short with a score of 8.2. Reviewers mention that Altium's intuitive interface and robust features make it easier to create complex designs efficiently.
- Reviewers say that Altium Designer's schematic editor is highly rated at 9.2, significantly outperforming CAM350's score of 7.5. Users appreciate the seamless integration of schematic and PCB layout, which enhances workflow and reduces errors.
- G2 users highlight that CAM350 offers superior ease of setup with a score of 9.3 compared to Altium Designer's 8.3. Users mention that CAM350's straightforward installation process allows for quicker onboarding, making it a favorable choice for small businesses.
- Users on G2 report that Altium Designer's component libraries score 8.3, providing a vast selection of components, while CAM350's libraries are rated lower at 7.3. Reviewers say that the extensive libraries in Altium save time and improve design accuracy.
- Reviewers mention that Altium Designer's quality of support is rated at 8.3, which is slightly lower than CAM350's 8.6. Users appreciate CAM350's responsive customer service, which they say is crucial for troubleshooting during critical design phases.
- Users say that Altium Designer shines in its product direction with a positive score of 8.8, indicating a strong commitment to innovation. In contrast, CAM350's score of 9.2 suggests a more established product roadmap, but some users feel it lacks the cutting-edge features found in Altium.
- Additional features and license options will affect price.
The user interface and tools are straightforward and 3D visualization of the board is decent.
It is slow, clunky, and sometimes it doesn't even run. Most of all it is buggy and the developers don't appear to want to fix them. The developers spend all of their time creating features for the pro users while taking away features from the standard users.
Best for this software like easy to use and best for dfm report and process job. Also if required if any changes then best for this software and import and export data for all data.
Its little complex to edit the data for HDI, complex mask, copper, special technology job. Drill, copper, mask, & silk editing is little complex with other software (UCAM, Genesis 2000, & Incam) If data found any problem in net list, Its kill time to...
The user interface and tools are straightforward and 3D visualization of the board is decent.
Best for this software like easy to use and best for dfm report and process job. Also if required if any changes then best for this software and import and export data for all data.
It is slow, clunky, and sometimes it doesn't even run. Most of all it is buggy and the developers don't appear to want to fix them. The developers spend all of their time creating features for the pro users while taking away features from the standard users.
Its little complex to edit the data for HDI, complex mask, copper, special technology job. Drill, copper, mask, & silk editing is little complex with other software (UCAM, Genesis 2000, & Incam) If data found any problem in net list, Its kill time to...
