Compare Akamai and Rackspace CDN 
- Users report that Akamai excels in Dynamic Content Routing with a score of 9.2, while Rackspace CDN shines even brighter with a score of 9.5, indicating a more efficient handling of dynamic content delivery.
- Reviewers mention that both Akamai and Rackspace CDN have strong capabilities in Static Content Caching, both scoring 9.2, but users on G2 highlight that Akamai's caching mechanisms are particularly robust for high-traffic scenarios.
- G2 users note that Rackspace CDN offers superior Ease of Setup with a score of 9.1 compared to Akamai's 7.6, making it a more user-friendly option for businesses looking to implement a CDN quickly.
- Reviewers say that Rackspace CDN outperforms Akamai in API Integration, scoring 9.3 versus Akamai's 8.1, which is crucial for developers looking for seamless integration with existing systems.
- Users report that Akamai's SSL capabilities are rated at 8.6, while Rackspace CDN offers a higher score of 9.2, indicating better security features that are essential for protecting sensitive data.
- Reviewers mention that while both platforms provide good Quality of Support, Rackspace CDN scores higher at 8.9 compared to Akamai's 8.1, suggesting a more responsive and helpful support team for users in need.
Delivery is top notch and exceeds the speeds of Limelight, edgecast, etc. They excel at larger files. Great features like gzip compression.
What I dislike is that it shows up in your programs installed on your computer. Most people scroll through and see this and say "what is this" and delete it.
Their REST API is easy to use and implement. In the years they've dropped charging for several type of API calls which has made the service a bit cheaper. Storage prices are cheap.
There is no way to move or rename a container. This is very annoying because I may need to rename a container to a different names after it has already been created. I also wish they had an application that my employees could use to browse the CDN and...
Delivery is top notch and exceeds the speeds of Limelight, edgecast, etc. They excel at larger files. Great features like gzip compression.
Their REST API is easy to use and implement. In the years they've dropped charging for several type of API calls which has made the service a bit cheaper. Storage prices are cheap.
What I dislike is that it shows up in your programs installed on your computer. Most people scroll through and see this and say "what is this" and delete it.
There is no way to move or rename a container. This is very annoying because I may need to rename a container to a different names after it has already been created. I also wish they had an application that my employees could use to browse the CDN and...
