Compare Akamai and CacheFly 
- Reviewers mention that Akamai's static content caching is rated at 9.2, which is slightly lower than CacheFly's impressive 9.4, indicating that users find CacheFly to be more efficient in handling static content.
- Users report that CacheFly excels in dynamic content routing with a score of 9.7 compared to Akamai's 9.2, suggesting that CacheFly provides a more seamless experience for dynamic content delivery.
- G2 users highlight CacheFly's cache purging feature, scoring an outstanding 9.9, while Akamai's score of 8.9 indicates that users find CacheFly's purging capabilities to be significantly more effective and user-friendly.
- Reviewers mention that CacheFly's SSL support is rated at 9.8, far surpassing Akamai's 8.6, which suggests that users feel more secure and satisfied with CacheFly's SSL implementation.
- Users on G2 report that CacheFly's dashboard and reporting features are rated at 9.4, while Akamai's scores of 7.9 and 8.0 respectively indicate that users find CacheFly's management tools to be more intuitive and comprehensive.
- Reviewers say that CacheFly's CMS integration is rated at 9.5, compared to Akamai's 8.5, highlighting that users appreciate CacheFly's superior compatibility with various content management systems.
Delivery is top notch and exceeds the speeds of Limelight, edgecast, etc. They excel at larger files. Great features like gzip compression.
The price that you pay for them compared to what you get at other providers is a major negative point.
I am using CacheFly CDN service for many years for our professional blog and other websites. Their origin pull is very good service. The sub user account, real time hits, FTP access, easy setup of origin pull CDN are the features which definitely reasons...
We had a zoom meeting to discuss the CDN and said they would provide us with an account after we send the IRS letter, we did that on 4/8/22 and send another message on 4/29/22 and they have failed to respond
Delivery is top notch and exceeds the speeds of Limelight, edgecast, etc. They excel at larger files. Great features like gzip compression.
I am using CacheFly CDN service for many years for our professional blog and other websites. Their origin pull is very good service. The sub user account, real time hits, FTP access, easy setup of origin pull CDN are the features which definitely reasons...
The price that you pay for them compared to what you get at other providers is a major negative point.
We had a zoom meeting to discuss the CDN and said they would provide us with an account after we send the IRS letter, we did that on 4/8/22 and send another message on 4/29/22 and they have failed to respond
