Best Software for 2025 is now live!

Compare Aikido Security and SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Aikido Security
Aikido Security
Star Rating
(41)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (75.6% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plans
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Star Rating
(90)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (43.8% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 4 pricing plans
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that SonarQube Server excels in Static Code Analysis with a score of 9.0, highlighting its ability to provide detailed insights into code quality. In contrast, Aikido Security also performs well with a score of 9.2, but users mention that its Vulnerability Scanning feature, rated at 9.7, offers more comprehensive coverage for security vulnerabilities.
  • Reviewers mention that Aikido Security shines in Ease of Use with a score of 9.5, making it more accessible for small businesses. In comparison, SonarQube Server's score of 8.3 indicates a steeper learning curve, particularly for users new to code quality tools.
  • G2 users highlight Aikido Security's superior Quality of Support with a score of 9.6, noting prompt responses and helpful resources. Conversely, SonarQube Server's support, rated at 8.0, is seen as adequate but less responsive, leading to some frustration among users seeking immediate assistance.
  • Users on G2 report that SonarQube Server's API / Integrations score of 7.7 is a limitation, as it lacks some modern integrations that Aikido Security, with a score of 8.7, provides. This makes Aikido a better choice for teams looking to integrate with a variety of development tools.
  • Reviewers mention that Aikido Security's Compliance Management feature, rated at 9.4, is particularly robust, helping organizations meet regulatory requirements effectively. In contrast, SonarQube Server's compliance features are less emphasized, with a lower score, which may be a drawback for compliance-focused teams.
  • Users say that Aikido Security's Test Automation capabilities, scoring 8.3, are more advanced compared to SonarQube Server's score of 6.3. This difference indicates that Aikido provides better tools for automating security testing, which is crucial for agile development environments.
Featured Products
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Aikido Security
Free (forever)
Free
Browse all 4 pricing plans
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Community Edition
Free
Browse all 4 pricing plans
Free Trial
Aikido Security
Free Trial is available
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.0
41
8.7
77
Ease of Use
9.5
41
8.3
79
Ease of Setup
9.6
34
7.8
50
Ease of Admin
9.3
27
8.3
46
Quality of Support
9.6
38
8.0
62
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.6
26
8.3
40
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
40
8.0
74
Features by Category
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)Hide 13 FeaturesShow 13 Features
8.7
118
7.5
194
Administration
8.7
13
7.7
14
Feature Not Available
6.3
15
Analysis
8.9
12
7.6
16
8.9
12
8.2
15
9.2
12
9.0
17
9.4
12
9.1
17
Testing
7.0
9
7.2
13
7.0
9
6.3
14
8.3
9
6.3
16
9.5
10
7.1
13
9.6
9
7.6
12
Feature Not Available
8.5
16
9.2
11
6.6
16
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)Hide 13 FeaturesShow 13 Features
9.0
87
Not enough data
Administration
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Analysis
9.4
11
Not enough data
9.2
11
Not enough data
9.5
10
Not enough data
9.7
10
Not enough data
9.5
10
Not enough data
Testing
8.3
8
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.3
9
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.6
9
Not enough data
8.4
111
Not enough data
Administration
8.9
17
Not enough data
7.8
17
Not enough data
9.0
17
Not enough data
8.3
15
Not enough data
Monitoring
8.9
16
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Protection
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.2
15
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.5
14
Not enough data
7.9
200
Not enough data
Performance
8.4
25
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.8
24
Not enough data
8.8
25
Not enough data
Network
7.8
23
Not enough data
7.4
21
Not enough data
7.5
22
Not enough data
Application
7.1
20
Not enough data
8.6
21
Not enough data
7.9
19
Not enough data
Software Development Analytics ToolsHide 6 FeaturesShow 6 Features
Not enough data
7.9
127
Functionality
Not enough data
7.8
24
Not enough data
8.3
23
Not enough data
8.3
22
Management
Not enough data
7.5
20
Not enough data
7.6
18
Not enough data
7.8
20
Software Composition AnalysisHide 6 FeaturesShow 6 Features
8.9
57
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.9
9
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.7
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.7
10
Not enough data
Not enough data
7.6
150
Documentation
Not enough data
7.7
26
Not enough data
7.4
26
Not enough data
8.2
27
Security
Not enough data
6.8
24
Not enough data
7.5
23
Not enough data
8.0
24
Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)Hide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
7.8
64
Not enough data
Configuration
6.9
7
Not enough data
7.4
7
Not enough data
7.2
6
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.5
8
Not enough data
Visibility
7.5
8
Not enough data
6.9
6
Not enough data
Vulnerability Management
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
9.0
7
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
Software Supply Chain Security ToolsHide 7 FeaturesShow 7 Features
8.1
27
Not enough data
Security
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.1
6
Not enough data
Tracking
8.0
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)Hide 9 FeaturesShow 9 Features
8.4
70
Not enough data
Risk management - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
8.8
8
Not enough data
8.5
8
Not enough data
9.4
8
Not enough data
8.1
8
Not enough data
Integration and efficiency - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
8.8
7
Not enough data
9.3
7
Not enough data
Reporting and Analytics - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
7.5
8
Not enough data
8.1
8
Not enough data
7.3
8
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Aikido Security
Aikido Security
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Aikido Security and SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) are categorized as Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Aikido Security
Aikido Security
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
75.6%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
24.4%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
0%
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
20.2%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
36.0%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
43.8%
Reviewers' Industry
Aikido Security
Aikido Security
Computer Software
34.1%
Information Technology and Services
29.3%
Hospital & Health Care
9.8%
Financial Services
7.3%
Retail
4.9%
Other
14.6%
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Computer Software
23.6%
Information Technology and Services
22.5%
Financial Services
7.9%
Hospital & Health Care
4.5%
Computer & Network Security
4.5%
Other
37.1%
Most Helpful Reviews
Aikido Security
Aikido Security
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Verified User
G
Verified User in Information Technology and Services

Aikido allowed us to implement a security by design process smoothly and quickly. My team loves the integration with Jira and how it feels a tool tailored on their needs of engineers (not security experts), no less and no more. Working with Aikido's team...

Most Helpful Critical Review
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Sachin S.
SS
Sachin S.
Verified User in Computer Software

As a DevOps team, we are managing and offering this tool to different teams within the organisation. Its seamlessly easy integration with other tool CI/CD tools such as Jenkins, and Azure DevOps Services is very useful. By which we can easily Analyze code...

Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User
G
Verified User in Medical Devices

My experience as a SonarSource customer shows that they manifest little interest in small customers. In addition, their quality policy is poor when it comes to fixing major bugs in their code. For instance, this ticket has now been open for 1 year without...

Alternatives
Aikido Security
Aikido Security Alternatives
Snyk
Snyk
Add Snyk
Wiz
Wiz
Add Wiz
GitHub
GitHub
Add GitHub
Scrut Automation
Scrut Automation
Add Scrut Automation
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Alternatives
Embold
Embold
Add Embold
GitHub
GitHub
Add GitHub
GitLab
GitLab
Add GitLab
Coverity
Coverity
Add Coverity
Discussions
Aikido Security
Aikido Security Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Aikido Security has no discussions with answers
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) has no discussions with answers