Compare Aikido Security and SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (77.8% of reviews)
Enterprise (43.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Free
Aikido Security
Star Rating
(54)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (77.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plansSonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Star Rating
(90)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (43.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 4 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that SonarQube Server excels in Static Code Analysis with a score of 9.0, providing comprehensive insights into code quality. In contrast, Aikido Security also performs well with a score of 9.2, but users mention that its Vulnerability Scanning feature, rated at 9.7, offers more thorough detection of security issues.
- Reviewers mention that Aikido Security shines in Ease of Use with a score of 9.5, making it more accessible for small businesses. In comparison, SonarQube Server's score of 8.3 indicates that it may require a steeper learning curve, particularly for new users.
- G2 users highlight Aikido Security's superior Quality of Support, scoring 9.6, which is significantly higher than SonarQube Server's score of 8.0. Reviewers say that Aikido's support team is responsive and helpful, which is crucial for businesses needing quick resolutions.
- Users on G2 report that SonarQube Server's API / Integrations score of 7.7 is lower than Aikido Security's 8.7, indicating that Aikido offers better integration capabilities with existing development tools, which is essential for seamless workflows.
- Reviewers mention that Aikido Security's Compliance Testing feature, rated at 9.5, is particularly robust, helping organizations meet regulatory requirements effectively. In contrast, SonarQube Server's compliance features are less emphasized, with a score of 7.1, which may be a drawback for compliance-focused users.
- Users say that Aikido Security's Test Automation capabilities, scoring 8.3, are more advanced compared to SonarQube Server's lower score of 6.3. This difference highlights Aikido's strength in automating security testing processes, which can save time and reduce manual effort.
Featured Products
Sponsored
Sleuth
(41)
Static Code Analysis
Visit Website
Sponsored
Axify
(6)
Static Code Analysis
Visit Website
Sponsored
OX Security
(50)
Static Code Analysis
Visit Website
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Aikido Security
Free (forever)
Free
For developers and curious minds
- Up to 2 users, 10 repos, 1 domain & 1 cloud account
- Cloud posture management (CSPM)
- Open source dependency scanning (SCA)
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Community Edition
Free
Explore: https://www.sonarsource.com/plans-and-pricing/
- Free
- Popular & classic languages support
- Integration with DevOps platforms
Free Trial
Aikido Security
Free Trial is available
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.0
54
8.7
77
Ease of Use
9.4
54
8.3
79
Ease of Setup
9.6
47
7.8
50
Ease of Admin
9.3
33
8.3
46
Quality of Support
9.6
46
8.0
62
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.6
30
8.3
40
Product Direction (% positive)
9.6
53
8.0
74
Features by Category
Administration
8.7
20
7.7
14
Feature Not Available
6.3
15
Analysis
8.4
19
7.6
16
8.8
19
8.2
15
9.0
19
9.0
17
9.4
18
9.1
17
Testing
7.0
15
7.2
13
6.8
14
6.3
14
7.4
14
6.3
16
8.9
16
7.1
13
8.6
15
7.6
12
Feature Not Available
8.5
16
8.1
17
6.6
16
Administration
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Analysis
9.2
13
Not enough data
9.2
13
Not enough data
9.4
12
Not enough data
9.7
12
Not enough data
9.4
12
Not enough data
Testing
8.0
10
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.9
11
Not enough data
8.5
11
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.3
11
Not enough data
Administration
8.9
21
Not enough data
7.7
21
Not enough data
9.0
21
Not enough data
8.5
19
Not enough data
Monitoring
8.5
21
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Protection
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.2
19
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.1
18
Not enough data
Performance
8.6
30
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.1
29
Not enough data
8.9
30
Not enough data
Network
7.7
28
Not enough data
7.7
26
Not enough data
7.8
27
Not enough data
Application
6.9
25
Not enough data
8.8
25
Not enough data
8.2
24
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
7.8
24
Not enough data
8.3
23
Not enough data
8.3
22
Management
Not enough data
7.5
20
Not enough data
7.6
18
Not enough data
7.8
20
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.7
10
Not enough data
8.7
10
Not enough data
8.7
10
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.6
11
Not enough data
9.1
11
Not enough data
8.6
11
Not enough data
Documentation
Not enough data
7.7
26
Not enough data
7.4
26
Not enough data
8.2
27
Security
Not enough data
6.8
24
Not enough data
7.5
23
Not enough data
8.0
24
Configuration
7.4
9
Not enough data
7.8
9
Not enough data
7.5
8
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.7
10
Not enough data
Visibility
7.8
10
Not enough data
7.3
8
Not enough data
Vulnerability Management
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
9.0
10
Not enough data
Security
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.1
6
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.1
7
Not enough data
Tracking
7.8
6
Not enough data
7.5
6
Not enough data
8.6
7
Not enough data
Risk management - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
9.0
14
Not enough data
8.6
13
Not enough data
9.1
13
Not enough data
8.3
13
Not enough data
Integration and efficiency - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.9
12
Not enough data
Reporting and Analytics - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
8.1
13
Not enough data
8.5
13
Not enough data
7.4
13
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Aikido Security and SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) are categorized as Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Unique Categories
Aikido Security is categorized as Software Supply Chain Security Tools, Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM), Software Composition Analysis, Container Security, Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), and Vulnerability Scanner
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) is categorized as Software Development Analytics Tools, Secure Code Review, and Static Code Analysis
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Aikido Security
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
33.3%
Information Technology and Services
31.5%
Hospital & Health Care
7.4%
Financial Services
5.6%
Computer & Network Security
5.6%
Other
16.7%
Computer Software
23.6%
Information Technology and Services
22.5%
Financial Services
7.9%
Hospital & Health Care
4.5%
Computer & Network Security
4.5%
Other
37.1%
Most Helpful Reviews
Aikido Security
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Aikido is a highly scalable and easy to use solution, which aggregates multiple controls in one place and integrates seamlessly with IDEs and CI/CD pipelines. The support team is responsive and made quick adjustments in our environment. Additionally, it...
Most Helpful Critical Review
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Sachin S.
Verified User in Computer Software
As a DevOps team, we are managing and offering this tool to different teams within the organisation. Its seamlessly easy integration with other tool CI/CD tools such as Jenkins, and Azure DevOps Services is very useful. By which we can easily Analyze code...
Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Medical Devices
My experience as a SonarSource customer shows that they manifest little interest in small customers. In addition, their quality policy is poor when it comes to fixing major bugs in their code. For instance, this ticket has now been open for 1 year without...
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Aikido is a highly scalable and easy to use solution, which aggregates multiple controls in one place and integrates seamlessly with IDEs and CI/CD pipelines. The support team is responsive and made quick adjustments in our environment. Additionally, it...
Sachin S.
Verified User in Computer Software
As a DevOps team, we are managing and offering this tool to different teams within the organisation. Its seamlessly easy integration with other tool CI/CD tools such as Jenkins, and Azure DevOps Services is very useful. By which we can easily Analyze code...
Verified User in Medical Devices
My experience as a SonarSource customer shows that they manifest little interest in small customers. In addition, their quality policy is poor when it comes to fixing major bugs in their code. For instance, this ticket has now been open for 1 year without...
Discussions
Aikido Security has no discussions with answers
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 2.5 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
