Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Abaqus and Maple 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (46.9% of reviews)
Enterprise (42.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Abaqus
Star Rating
(50)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (46.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about AbaqusMaple
Star Rating
(15)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about MapleSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that while both Maple and Abaqus have a solid star rating of 4.3, Maple is favored for its ease of use with a score of 8.0 compared to Abaqus's 7.5, making it more accessible for new users.
- Reviewers mention that Maple excels in fluid analysis with a score of 8.2, while Abaqus shines in finite element analysis, scoring 8.8, indicating that users looking for advanced structural simulations may prefer Abaqus.
- G2 users highlight that Maple's drawing tools received a score of 6.6, which some find less robust compared to Abaqus's overall design capabilities, suggesting that users focused on detailed modeling may lean towards Abaqus.
- Users on G2 report that Maple's quality of support is rated at 8.5, which is higher than Abaqus's 8.1, indicating that users may find better assistance and resources when using Maple.
- Reviewers say that both products have a good product direction, but Maple's score of 7.9 slightly outperforms Abaqus's 7.4, suggesting that users feel more confident in Maple's future development and updates.
- Users report that Abaqus is particularly strong in mechanical event simulation with a score of 8.4, which is crucial for users in industries requiring detailed mechanical analysis, while Maple's overall simulation capabilities are rated lower.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Abaqus
No pricing availableMaple
No pricing availableFree Trial
Abaqus
No trial information availableMaple
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.6
37
8.9
11
Ease of Use
7.5
38
8.0
11
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.1
35
8.5
8
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
7.4
36
7.9
11
Features by Category
Design
6.4
18
Not enough data
6.6
18
Not enough data
6.5
19
Not enough data
7.0
16
Not enough data
Tools
8.2
14
Not enough data
8.8
22
Not enough data
8.1
16
Not enough data
Work
7.9
15
Not enough data
8.1
13
Not enough data
8.4
18
Not enough data
8.0
14
Not enough data
8.0
11
Not enough data
Environment
7.0
15
Not enough data
8.3
12
Not enough data
8.5
13
Not enough data
8.6
18
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Abaqus and Maple are categorized as Simulation & CAE
Unique Categories
Abaqus has no unique categories
Maple has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Abaqus
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Maple
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Higher Education
20.4%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
16.3%
Automotive
16.3%
Aviation & Aerospace
12.2%
Research
10.2%
Other
24.5%
Higher Education
28.6%
Information Technology and Services
14.3%
Computer Software
14.3%
Research
7.1%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
7.1%
Other
28.6%
Alternatives
Discussions
Abaqus has no discussions with answers
Maple has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
